ALB vs. LAC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC).

Performance

ALB vs. LAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALB vs. LAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ALB Albemarle Corporation	27.24%	67.72%	-39.50%	-10.79%
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	-9.40%	46.80%	-53.59%	-36.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ALB : $21.13B LAC : $962.45M
EPS ALB : -$4.69 LAC : $0.00
PB Ratio ALB : 2.90 LAC : 0.91
Total Revenue (TTM) ALB : $5.14B LAC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) ALB : $668.72M LAC : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) ALB : $221.01M LAC : $0.00

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a 27.24% return, which is significantly higher than LAC's -9.40% return.

ALB

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 27.24%
• 6M: 122.64%
• 1Y: 153.65%
• 3Y*: -5.28%
• 5Y*: 4.79%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

LAC

• 1D: 4.22%
• 1M: -21.94%
• YTD: -9.40%
• 6M: -30.82%
• 1Y: 45.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ALB vs. LAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALB

ALB Risk / Return Rank: 91
ALB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ALB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ALB Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ALB Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ALB Martin Ratio Rank: 93

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 64
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 71
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALB vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALB	LAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	0.35	+2.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	1.89	+0.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.22	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.15	0.73	+4.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.66	1.33	+11.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALB vs. LAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALB Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the LAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALB and LAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALB	LAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	0.35	+2.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	-0.31	+0.62

Correlation

The correlation between ALB and LAC is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ALB vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison

ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while LAC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALB Albemarle Corporation	0.90%	1.15%	1.87%	1.11%	0.73%	0.67%	1.04%	2.01%	1.74%	1.00%	1.42%	2.07%
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ALB vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -83.90%, roughly equal to the maximum LAC drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and LAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALB	LAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.90%	-81.83%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.74%	-63.08%	+33.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.07%	-66.30%	+24.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.55%	-63.63%	+43.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.09%	34.87%	-22.78%

Volatility

ALB vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is 16.32%, while Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) has a volatility of 17.31%. This indicates that ALB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALB	LAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.32%	17.31%	-0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.64%	69.33%	-25.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.79%	130.24%	-65.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.87%	102.66%	-48.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.65%	102.66%	-55.01%

Financials