ALB vs. LAC
Compare and contrast key facts about Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ALB or LAC.
Performance
ALB vs. LAC - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a -27.52% return, which is significantly higher than LAC's -41.88% return.
ALB
-27.52%
8.82%
-20.38%
-17.56%
10.56%
6.85%
LAC
-41.88%
13.07%
-16.78%
-46.47%
N/A
N/A
Fundamentals
| ALB | LAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.08B | $893.17M |
| EPS | -$16.76 | -$0.12 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $6.50B | $53.29K |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $689.47M | -$157.97K |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -$1.93B | -$26.49M |
Key characteristics
| ALB | LAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.30 | -0.61 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.05 | -0.63 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.99 | 0.93 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.23 | -0.62 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.62 | -1.08 |
| Ulcer Index | 28.77% | 46.99% |
| Daily Std Dev | 59.09% | 82.52% |
| Max Drawdown | -77.22% | -81.83% |
| Current Drawdown | -67.48% | -68.26% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between ALB and LAC is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ALB vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ALB vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison
ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while LAC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.55% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.02% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% | 1.83% | 1.51% |
LAC Lithium Americas Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ALB vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -77.22%, smaller than the maximum LAC drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and LAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ALB vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is 17.29%, while Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) has a volatility of 29.00%. This indicates that ALB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ALB vs. LAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Albemarle Corporation and Lithium Americas Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities