ALB vs. LAC

In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a -32.04% return, which is significantly lower than LAC's -0.34% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ALB Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the LAC Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALB and LAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, while LAC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -83.90%, roughly equal to the maximum LAC drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and LAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a higher volatility of 30.65% compared to Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) at 25.35%. This indicates that ALB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Albemarle Corporation and Lithium Americas Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.