ALB vs. LTHM
ALB (Albemarle Corporation) and LTHM (Livent Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Chemicals industry within the Basic Materials sector. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ALB vs. LTHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ALB
- 1D
- -3.73%
- 1M
- -5.55%
- YTD
- 13.94%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 173.60%
- 3Y*
- -9.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
LTHM
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALB vs. LTHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 13.94% | 67.72% | -39.50% | -32.80% | -6.63% | 59.76% | 105.39% | -3.28% | -19.14% |
LTHM Livent Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | -8.18% | -9.51% | -18.50% | 29.41% | 120.35% | -38.04% | -15.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALB and LTHM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2018 | 0.57 |
The correlation between ALB and LTHM shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ALB:
$5.49B
LTHM:
$920.10M
ALB:
$1.02B
LTHM:
$539.80M
ALB:
$801.97M
LTHM:
$491.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALB vs. LTHM — Risk / Return Rank
ALB
LTHM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ALB vs. LTHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Livent Corporation (LTHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALB | LTHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.11 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALB vs. LTHM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALB | LTHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.13% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.70% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.83% | — | — |
Volatility
ALB vs. LTHM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALB | LTHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.59% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.66% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.35% | — | — |
Dividends
ALB vs. LTHM - Dividend Comparison
ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while LTHM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.01% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
LTHM Livent Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ALB vs. LTHM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Albemarle Corporation and Livent Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ALB and LTHM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ALB and LTHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer