ALB vs. LIT
Compare and contrast key facts about Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).
LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ALB or LIT.
Correlation
The correlation between ALB and LIT is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ALB vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ALB:
-0.31
LIT:
-0.14
ALB:
-0.08
LIT:
0.03
ALB:
0.99
LIT:
1.00
ALB:
-0.23
LIT:
-0.07
ALB:
-0.66
LIT:
-0.36
ALB:
27.23%
LIT:
12.47%
ALB:
57.65%
LIT:
32.60%
ALB:
-77.22%
LIT:
-62.61%
ALB:
-69.26%
LIT:
-54.71%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's 3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, ALB has underperformed LIT with an annualized return of 6.86%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively higher 8.27% annualized return.
ALB
13.26%
7.68%
6.77%
-16.09%
4.97%
6.86%
LIT
3.68%
1.05%
6.00%
-5.29%
7.92%
8.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ALB vs. LIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ALB
LIT
ALB vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ALB vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than LIT's 0.90% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.65% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.02% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% | 1.83% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.90% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
ALB vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -77.22%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ALB vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a higher volatility of 12.56% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 6.66%. This indicates that ALB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.