ALB vs. EMN
Compare and contrast key facts about Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ALB or EMN.
Key characteristics
| ALB | EMN | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -20.70% | 8.72% |
| 1Y Return | -37.29% | 22.25% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -10.17% | -2.01% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.14% | 7.32% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.17% | 4.39% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.64 | 0.95 |
| Daily Std Dev | 52.40% | 24.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -66.31% | -76.11% |
| Current Drawdown | -64.42% | -17.82% |
Fundamentals
| ALB | EMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.18B | $11.34B |
| EPS | $13.36 | $7.49 |
| PE Ratio | 8.39 | 12.87 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.51 | 1.14 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.62B | $9.21B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $3.08B | $2.18B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $897.07M | $1.54B |
Correlation
The correlation between ALB and EMN is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ALB vs. EMN - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a -20.70% return, which is significantly lower than EMN's 8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ALB has outperformed EMN with an annualized return of 7.17%, while EMN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.39% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ALB vs. EMN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ALB vs. EMN - Dividend Comparison
ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than EMN's 3.31% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.40% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% | 1.83% | 1.51% |
EMN Eastman Chemical Company | 3.31% | 3.54% | 3.77% | 2.34% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 2.26% | 2.51% | 2.46% | 1.91% | 1.55% |
Drawdowns
ALB vs. EMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -66.31%, smaller than the maximum EMN drawdown of -76.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and EMN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ALB vs. EMN - Volatility Comparison
Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a higher volatility of 16.34% compared to Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) at 6.36%. This indicates that ALB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ALB vs. EMN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Albemarle Corporation and Eastman Chemical Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities