ALB vs. EMN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN).

Performance

ALB vs. EMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALB vs. EMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ALB Albemarle Corporation	26.49%	67.72%	-39.50%	-32.80%	-6.63%	59.76%	105.39%	-3.28%	-38.89%	50.22%
EMN Eastman Chemical Company	20.20%	-26.87%	5.11%	14.66%	-30.38%	23.54%	31.78%	12.01%	-19.10%	26.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ALB : $21.01B EMN : $8.71B
EPS ALB : -$4.69 EMN : $4.10
PS Ratio ALB : 4.08 EMN : 1.00
PB Ratio ALB : 2.88 EMN : 1.46
Total Revenue (TTM) ALB : $5.14B EMN : $8.75B
Gross Profit (TTM) ALB : $668.72M EMN : $1.84B
EBITDA (TTM) ALB : $221.01M EMN : $1.30B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a 26.49% return, which is significantly higher than EMN's 20.20% return. Over the past 10 years, ALB has outperformed EMN with an annualized return of 12.10%, while EMN has yielded a comparatively lower 3.65% annualized return.

ALB

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 26.49%
• 6M: 112.44%
• 1Y: 152.86%
• 3Y*: -5.47%
• 5Y*: 4.67%
• 10Y*: 12.10%

EMN

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 1.92%
• YTD: 20.20%
• 6M: 25.44%
• 1Y: -9.70%
• 3Y*: 0.42%
• 5Y*: -3.98%
• 10Y*: 3.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ALB vs. EMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALB

ALB Risk / Return Rank: 90
ALB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
ALB Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
ALB Omega Ratio Rank: 86
ALB Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ALB Martin Ratio Rank: 92

EMN

EMN Risk / Return Rank: 30
EMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
EMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
EMN Omega Ratio Rank: 28
EMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EMN Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALB vs. EMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALB	EMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	-0.23	+2.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	-0.03	+2.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.00	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.12	-0.28	+5.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.58	-0.48	+13.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALB vs. EMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALB Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the EMN Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALB and EMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALB	EMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	-0.23	+2.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	-0.13	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	0.12	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.23	+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between ALB and EMN is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ALB vs. EMN - Dividend Comparison

ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than EMN's 4.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALB Albemarle Corporation	0.91%	1.15%	1.87%	1.11%	0.73%	0.67%	1.04%	2.01%	1.74%	1.00%	1.42%	2.07%
EMN Eastman Chemical Company	4.41%	5.22%	3.57%	3.54%	3.77%	2.34%	2.66%	3.18%	3.15%	2.26%	2.51%	2.46%

Drawdowns

ALB vs. EMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -83.90%, which is greater than EMN's maximum drawdown of -76.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and EMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALB	EMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.90%	-76.11%	-7.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.74%	-34.67%	+4.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.90%	-49.35%	-34.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.90%	-62.74%	-21.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.41%	-30.16%	-12.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.56%	-19.06%	-1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.10%	20.38%	-8.28%

Volatility

ALB vs. EMN - Volatility Comparison

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a higher volatility of 14.09% compared to Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) at 12.18%. This indicates that ALB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALB	EMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.09%	12.18%	+1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.00%	25.39%	+17.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.79%	42.73%	+22.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.85%	31.97%	+21.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.64%	31.67%	+15.97%

Financials

ALB vs. EMN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Albemarle Corporation and Eastman Chemical Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ALB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a gross profit of 197.93M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.9%.

EMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eastman Chemical Company reported a gross profit of 338.00M and revenue of 1.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.1%.

ALB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported an operating income of -217.39M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of -15.2%.

EMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eastman Chemical Company reported an operating income of 121.00M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

ALB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a net income of -455.87M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of -31.9%.

EMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eastman Chemical Company reported a net income of 105.00M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.