PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAZ vs. DOLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAZ vs. DOLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and Dole plc (DOLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAZ achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly higher than DOLE's -7.60% return.


LAZ

1D
-3.50%
1M
8.72%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
-10.25%
1Y
12.14%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
4.78%
10Y*
8.79%

DOLE

1D
-2.75%
1M
-9.29%
YTD
-7.60%
6M
-5.43%
1Y
-0.11%
3Y*
2.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAZ vs. DOLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
-1.16%-1.64%54.83%6.92%-16.21%-5.73%
DOLE
Dole plc
-7.60%13.36%12.83%30.80%-25.25%-7.57%

Correlation

The correlation between LAZ and DOLE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2021

0.28

The correlation between LAZ and DOLE shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAZ:

$5.03B

DOLE:

$1.32B

EPS

LAZ:

$2.61

DOLE:

$0.96

PE Ratio

LAZ:

18.04

DOLE:

14.28

PS Ratio

LAZ:

1.53

DOLE:

0.14

PB Ratio

LAZ:

5.70

DOLE:

0.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAZ:

$3.28B

DOLE:

$9.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAZ:

$1.54B

DOLE:

$717.11M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAZ:

$477.61M

DOLE:

$332.26M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAZ vs. DOLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAZ
LAZ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DOLE
DOLE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DOLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOLE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DOLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOLE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAZ vs. DOLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and Dole plc (DOLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAZDOLEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.33

-0.00

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.71

0.17

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.02

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

-0.01

+0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.91

-0.01

+0.93

LAZ vs. DOLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the DOLE Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAZ and DOLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAZDOLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

-0.00

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.05

+0.13

Drawdowns

LAZ vs. DOLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAZ drawdown since its inception was -62.72%, which is greater than DOLE's maximum drawdown of -55.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAZ and DOLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAZDOLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.72%

-55.66%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.39%

-15.39%

-16.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.24%

-27.70%

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.26%

-16.71%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.47%

-21.55%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.30%

7.51%

+5.79%

Volatility

LAZ vs. DOLE - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Ltd (LAZ) has a higher volatility of 10.64% compared to Dole plc (DOLE) at 8.73%. This indicates that LAZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAZDOLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.64%

8.73%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.05%

16.35%

+13.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.86%

25.74%

+11.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.81%

29.57%

+7.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.02%

29.57%

+6.45%

Dividends

LAZ vs. DOLE - Dividend Comparison

LAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than DOLE's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DOLE
Dole plc
2.47%2.23%2.36%2.60%3.32%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
4.25%4.12%3.89%5.75%5.60%4.31%4.44%5.88%8.21%5.35%6.55%5.22%

Financials

LAZ vs. DOLE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lazard Ltd and Dole plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
779.40M
2.34B
(LAZ) Total Revenue
(DOLE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LAZ vs. DOLE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lazard Ltd and Dole plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
7.9%
Portfolio components
LAZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a gross profit of 779.40M and revenue of 779.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

DOLE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dole plc reported a gross profit of 184.99M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.

LAZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported an operating income of 112.39M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

DOLE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dole plc reported an operating income of 61.96M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.

LAZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a net income of 100.92M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.

DOLE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dole plc reported a net income of 80.10M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LAZ and DOLE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAZ has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to DOLE (8.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAZ dropped -62.72% vs DOLE's -55.66%.

LAZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAZ and DOLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer