KRBN vs. KBND

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

KRBN (KraneShares Global Carbon ETF) and KBND (KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KRBN is a Commodities fund tracking the IHS Markit Global Carbon Index, while KBND is a International Government Bonds fund tracking the KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KRBN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KBND.

Performance

KRBN vs. KBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KRBN

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 2.64%
• YTD: -6.55%
• 6M: -2.44%
• 1Y: 14.88%
• 3Y*: 2.19%
• 5Y*: 7.33%
• 10Y*: —

KBND

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRBN vs. KBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF	-6.55%	23.11%	-13.56%	8.01%	-12.75%	107.69%	22.60%
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.89%	3.13%	-6.81%	4.41%	10.21%

Correlation

The correlation between KRBN and KBND is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020	0.10

Return for Risk

KRBN vs. KBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRBN

KRBN Risk / Return Rank: 20
KRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
KRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
KRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRBN vs. KBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KRBN	KBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.56	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KRBN	KBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KRBN	KBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.82%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.14%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.56%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KRBN	KBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.10%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.91%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.10%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.62%	—	—

KRBN vs. KBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRBN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KBND's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

KRBN vs. KBND - Dividend Comparison

KRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	2.20%	2.51%	6.97%	2.27%	3.47%	4.98%	0.00%	0.04%	1.16%
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF	2.04%	1.90%	7.10%	7.60%	22.91%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KRBN and KBND in my portfolio?

KRBN and KBND have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KRBN or KBND?

On fees, KBND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KRBN or KBND?

KBND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KRBN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KRBN or KBND?

KRBN has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.

What is the main difference between KRBN and KBND?

KRBN is categorized as Commodities, while KBND is International Government Bonds. KRBN tracks IHS Markit Global Carbon Index, while KBND tracks KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KRBN and 0.50% for KBND.