KBND vs. IVOL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL).

KBND and IVOL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KBND is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2014. IVOL is an actively managed fund by CICC. It was launched on May 13, 2019.

Performance

KBND vs. IVOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KBND vs. IVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.89%	3.13%	-6.81%	4.41%	9.38%	0.72%
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF	-1.46%	11.97%	-11.07%	-5.18%	-12.69%	-0.31%	14.56%	3.23%

Returns By Period

KBND

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IVOL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -1.70%
• YTD: -1.46%
• 6M: -1.19%
• 1Y: 3.84%
• 3Y*: -2.83%
• 5Y*: -4.62%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBND vs. IVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IVOL's 0.99% expense ratio.

IVOL

Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF

KBND

KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF

Return for Risk

KBND vs. IVOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOL

IVOL Risk / Return Rank: 23
IVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
IVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
IVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 23
IVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
IVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBND vs. IVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KBND	IVOL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.05	—

Correlation

The correlation between KBND and IVOL is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KBND vs. IVOL - Dividend Comparison

KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	2.20%	2.51%	6.97%	2.27%	3.47%	4.98%	0.00%	0.04%	1.16%
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF	3.73%	3.61%	3.83%	3.73%	3.92%	3.93%	3.44%	2.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KBND	IVOL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-31.16%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-22.51%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-13.02%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KBND	IVOL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	10.40%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	12.82%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	12.11%	—