PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBND vs. IVOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBND vs. IVOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


KBND

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVOL

1D
-0.34%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
-6.33%
6M
-7.21%
1Y
-5.59%
3Y*
-3.54%
5Y*
-5.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBND vs. IVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
KBND
KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.89%3.13%-6.81%4.41%9.38%0.72%
IVOL
Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF
-6.33%11.97%-11.07%-5.18%-12.69%-0.31%14.56%3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between KBND and IVOL is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2019

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBND vs. IVOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBND

IVOL
IVOL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBND vs. IVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KBND vs. IVOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBNDIVOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

Drawdowns

KBND vs. IVOL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBNDIVOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

Volatility

KBND vs. IVOL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBNDIVOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.99%

KBND vs. IVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IVOL's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBND vs. IVOL - Dividend Comparison

KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOL
Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF
3.89%3.61%3.83%3.73%3.92%3.93%3.44%2.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KBND
KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.40%2.20%2.51%6.97%2.27%3.47%4.98%0.00%0.04%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBND and IVOL have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KBND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KBND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.

IVOL has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.

KBND is categorized as International Government Bonds, while IVOL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KBND and 0.99% for IVOL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBND and IVOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer