KBND vs. KWEB
KBND (KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBND is a International Government Bonds fund tracking the KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index, while KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBND charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.
Performance
KBND vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KBND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KWEB
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- -28.08%
- 6M
- -29.18%
- 1Y
- -22.79%
- 3Y*
- 0.71%
- 5Y*
- -15.81%
- 10Y*
- -0.57%
KBND vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.89% | 3.13% | -6.81% | 4.41% | 9.38% | 1.25% | -0.09% | 9.89% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | -28.08% | 23.55% | 12.01% | -9.06% | -17.24% | -49.01% | 58.23% | 29.92% | -33.80% | 69.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBND and KWEB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2014 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBND vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank
KBND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KWEB
KBND vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBND | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.87 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBND vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBND | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -80.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -72.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -71.68% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -35.36% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.70% | — |
Volatility
KBND vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBND | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 27.17% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 47.70% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 40.00% | — |
KBND vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBND vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 2.20% | 2.51% | 6.97% | 2.27% | 3.47% | 4.98% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.16% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 8.56% | 6.16% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBND and KWEB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KBND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KBND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for KWEB.
KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 8.56%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.
KBND is categorized as International Government Bonds, while KWEB is China Equities. KBND tracks KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index, while KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KBND and 0.70% for KWEB.
Find the right allocation for KBND and KWEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer