PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBND vs. KWEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBND vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


KBND

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KWEB

1D
-2.24%
1M
-8.99%
YTD
-28.08%
6M
-29.18%
1Y
-22.79%
3Y*
0.71%
5Y*
-15.81%
10Y*
-0.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBND vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBND
KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.89%3.13%-6.81%4.41%9.38%1.25%-0.09%9.89%
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
-28.08%23.55%12.01%-9.06%-17.24%-49.01%58.23%29.92%-33.80%69.73%

Correlation

The correlation between KBND and KWEB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2014

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBND vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


KWEB
KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBND vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBNDKWEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

KBND vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBND vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBNDKWEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.70%

Volatility

KBND vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBNDKWEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.00%

KBND vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBND vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBND
KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.40%2.20%2.51%6.97%2.27%3.47%4.98%0.00%0.04%1.16%
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
8.56%6.16%3.51%1.71%0.00%7.07%0.29%0.08%3.40%0.58%1.19%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBND and KWEB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KBND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KBND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for KWEB.

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 8.56%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.

KBND is categorized as International Government Bonds, while KWEB is China Equities. KBND tracks KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index, while KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KBND and 0.70% for KWEB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBND and KWEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer