KBND vs. KEMQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KBND (KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF) and KEMQ (KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBND is a International Government Bonds fund tracking the KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index, while KEMQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBND charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KEMQ.

Performance

KBND vs. KEMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KBND

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KEMQ

• 1D: -3.77%
• 1M: 1.99%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 6M: 2.85%
• 1Y: 21.94%
• 3Y*: 22.94%
• 5Y*: -4.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBND vs. KEMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.89%	3.13%	-6.81%	4.41%	9.38%	1.25%	-0.09%	0.80%
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	2.13%	56.28%	13.81%	0.77%	-38.09%	-27.31%	39.26%	28.26%	-25.52%	1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between KBND and KEMQ is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017	0.16

Return for Risk

KBND vs. KEMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KEMQ

KEMQ Risk / Return Rank: 23
KEMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KEMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KEMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 24
KEMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
KEMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBND vs. KEMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBND	KEMQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.81	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.25	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.16	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.00	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.59	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KBND	KEMQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-70.72%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.94%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.94%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-31.41%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-35.64%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KBND	KEMQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	22.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	27.40%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	32.15%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	29.67%	—

KBND vs. KEMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMQ's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBND vs. KEMQ - Dividend Comparison

KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	2.20%	2.51%	6.97%	2.27%	3.47%	4.98%	0.00%	0.04%	1.16%
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	5.16%	5.27%	0.73%	0.29%	0.00%	0.28%	2.28%	1.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBND and KEMQ in my portfolio?

KBND and KEMQ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KBND or KEMQ?

On fees, KBND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBND or KEMQ?

KBND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KEMQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBND or KEMQ?

KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.

What is the main difference between KBND and KEMQ?

KBND is categorized as International Government Bonds, while KEMQ is Emerging Markets Equities. KBND tracks KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index, while KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KBND and 0.60% for KEMQ.