KRBN vs. CNRG
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG).
KRBN and CNRG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KRBN is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the IHS Markit Global Carbon Index. It was launched on Jul 30, 2020. CNRG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2018. Both KRBN and CNRG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KRBN or CNRG.
Correlation
The correlation between KRBN and CNRG is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KRBN vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KRBN:
-0.70
CNRG:
-0.52
KRBN:
-0.90
CNRG:
-0.58
KRBN:
0.90
CNRG:
0.94
KRBN:
-0.47
CNRG:
-0.27
KRBN:
-1.31
CNRG:
-1.16
KRBN:
13.15%
CNRG:
13.79%
KRBN:
24.62%
CNRG:
30.68%
KRBN:
-36.66%
CNRG:
-59.60%
KRBN:
-34.76%
CNRG:
-57.71%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRBN achieves a -23.84% return, which is significantly lower than CNRG's -16.44% return.
KRBN
-23.84%
-11.52%
-14.47%
-19.10%
N/A
N/A
CNRG
-16.44%
-2.58%
-6.78%
-12.69%
8.32%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KRBN vs. CNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison
KRBN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CNRG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KRBN vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KRBN vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison
KRBN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF | 0.00% | 7.60% | 22.91% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF | 1.22% | 1.17% | 1.23% | 1.34% | 0.69% | 1.16% | 0.35% |
Drawdowns
KRBN vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRBN drawdown since its inception was -36.66%, smaller than the maximum CNRG drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRBN and CNRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KRBN vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) at 6.83%. This indicates that KRBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.