PortfoliosLab logo
KRBN vs. LIT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KRBN and LIT is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

KRBN vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
96.65%
7.38%
KRBN
LIT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KRBN:

-0.27

LIT:

-0.35

Sortino Ratio

KRBN:

-0.25

LIT:

-0.32

Omega Ratio

KRBN:

0.97

LIT:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

KRBN:

-0.17

LIT:

-0.18

Martin Ratio

KRBN:

-0.52

LIT:

-0.77

Ulcer Index

KRBN:

11.42%

LIT:

15.32%

Daily Std Dev

KRBN:

22.05%

LIT:

33.42%

Max Drawdown

KRBN:

-36.42%

LIT:

-65.91%

Current Drawdown

KRBN:

-29.79%

LIT:

-60.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRBN achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's -9.32% return.


KRBN

YTD

-5.19%

1M

-3.04%

6M

-7.07%

1Y

-7.78%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

LIT

YTD

-9.32%

1M

-8.26%

6M

-15.13%

1Y

-11.55%

5Y*

9.81%

10Y*

5.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KRBN vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRBN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for KRBN: current value is 0.79%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
KRBN: 0.79%
Expense ratio chart for LIT: current value is 0.75%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
LIT: 0.75%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KRBN vs. LIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRBN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KRBN is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KRBN is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KRBN is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KRBN is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KRBN is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KRBN is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

LIT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LIT is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LIT is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LIT is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LIT is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LIT is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LIT is 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KRBN vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for KRBN, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
KRBN: -0.27
LIT: -0.35
The chart of Sortino ratio for KRBN, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
KRBN: -0.25
LIT: -0.32
The chart of Omega ratio for KRBN, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
KRBN: 0.97
LIT: 0.96
The chart of Calmar ratio for KRBN, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
KRBN: -0.17
LIT: -0.18
The chart of Martin ratio for KRBN, currently valued at -0.52, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
KRBN: -0.52
LIT: -0.77

The current KRBN Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is comparable to the LIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRBN and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.27
-0.35
KRBN
LIT

Dividends

KRBN vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

KRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than LIT's 1.03% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KRBN
KraneShares Global Carbon ETF
7.49%7.10%7.60%22.91%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
1.03%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%1.07%

Drawdowns

KRBN vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRBN drawdown since its inception was -36.42%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRBN and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-29.79%
-60.39%
KRBN
LIT

Volatility

KRBN vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) is 8.09%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that KRBN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
8.09%
15.40%
KRBN
LIT