KBND vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
KBND and QYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KBND is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2014. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. Both KBND and QYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KBND or QYLD.
Key characteristics
| KBND | QYLD |
|---|
Correlation
The correlation between KBND and QYLD is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KBND vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KBND vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KBND vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KBND vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.72%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF | 1.77% | 2.20% | 2.51% | 6.97% | 2.27% | 3.47% | 4.98% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.16% | 0.26% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.72% | 11.78% | 13.26% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% | 10.74% |
Drawdowns
KBND vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
KBND vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) is 0.00%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that KBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.