KBND vs. FLIA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KBND (KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF) and FLIA (Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF) are both International Government Bonds funds. KBND is passively managed, while FLIA is actively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBND charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FLIA.

Performance

KBND vs. FLIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KBND

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLIA

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.53%
• 1Y: 2.32%
• 3Y*: 3.49%
• 5Y*: 0.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBND vs. FLIA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.89%	3.13%	-6.81%	4.41%	9.38%	1.25%	-4.94%
FLIA Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF	1.63%	2.12%	2.42%	7.17%	-7.68%	-1.98%	1.37%	7.58%	-2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between KBND and FLIA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2018	0.07

Return for Risk

KBND vs. FLIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLIA

FLIA Risk / Return Rank: 22
FLIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
FLIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FLIA Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FLIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
FLIA Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBND vs. FLIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND) and Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBND	FLIA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.71	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.03	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.13	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.14	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.00	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KBND	FLIA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-11.24%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.04%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-2.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.20%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.78%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.78%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KBND	FLIA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.64%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.32%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	4.42%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	4.70%	—

KBND vs. FLIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLIA's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBND vs. FLIA - Dividend Comparison

KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLIA Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF	2.68%	2.62%	2.97%	0.93%	18.12%	2.26%	0.43%	2.93%	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	2.20%	2.51%	6.97%	2.27%	3.47%	4.98%	0.00%	0.04%	1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBND and FLIA in my portfolio?

KBND and FLIA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KBND or FLIA?

On fees, FLIA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBND or FLIA?

FLIA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBND or FLIA?

FLIA has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.

What is the main difference between KBND and FLIA?

They also come from different issuers: CICC and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KBND and 0.25% for FLIA.