KRBN vs. MLPR
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR).
KRBN and MLPR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KRBN is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the IHS Markit Global Carbon Index. It was launched on Jul 30, 2020. MLPR is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. Both KRBN and MLPR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KRBN or MLPR.
Key characteristics
| KRBN | MLPR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -10.06% | 24.48% |
| 1Y Return | -6.13% | 31.06% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.66% | 30.83% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.21 | 1.46 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.16 | 2.04 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.98 | 1.26 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.15 | 2.46 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.41 | 7.52 |
| Ulcer Index | 12.14% | 4.08% |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.17% | 20.97% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.42% | -48.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -22.95% | -4.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRBN and MLPR is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KRBN vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, KRBN achieves a -10.06% return, which is significantly lower than MLPR's 24.48% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KRBN vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
KRBN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KRBN vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KRBN vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison
KRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than MLPR's 10.12% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF | 3.44% | 7.60% | 22.91% | 0.49% | 0.00% |
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 10.12% | 10.08% | 10.07% | 10.69% | 4.21% |
Drawdowns
KRBN vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRBN drawdown since its inception was -36.42%, smaller than the maximum MLPR drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRBN and MLPR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KRBN vs. MLPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) is 5.33%, while ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that KRBN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.