KEMQ vs. EEMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KEMQ (KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF) and EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index, while EEMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KEMQ returned -2.87%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for EEMO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KEMQ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EEMO.

Performance

KEMQ vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 40.25% return.

KEMQ

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 7.12%
• YTD: 6.99%
• 6M: 8.35%
• 1Y: 36.95%
• 3Y*: 24.42%
• 5Y*: -2.87%
• 10Y*: —

EEMO

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 18.59%
• YTD: 40.25%
• 6M: 41.33%
• 1Y: 57.41%
• 3Y*: 25.30%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: 8.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMQ vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	6.99%	56.28%	13.81%	0.77%	-38.09%	-27.31%	39.26%	28.26%	-25.52%	1.88%
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	40.25%	10.99%	9.88%	13.90%	-18.73%	-5.57%	9.66%	21.17%	-17.24%	3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMQ and EEMO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017	0.73

The correlation between KEMQ and EEMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (3 years) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KEMQ vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KEMQ	EEMO
Technology	45.0%	43.8%
Consumer Cyclical	33.0%	3.2%
Communication Services	15.5%	1.5%
Healthcare	3.5%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.4%	1.2%
Basic Materials	-	12.9%
Energy	-	2.5%
Financial Services	-	18.0%
Industrials	-	11.5%
Real Estate	-	0.5%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

KEMQ vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMQ

KEMQ Risk / Return Rank: 36
KEMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
KEMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
KEMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 38
KEMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
KEMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 31

EEMO

EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 75
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMQ vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KEMQ	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	2.36	-0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	3.28	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.46	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	3.91	-2.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.52	15.67	-11.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KEMQ vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMQ and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KEMQ	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	2.36	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	0.37	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.13	-0.07

Drawdowns

KEMQ vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, which is greater than EEMO's maximum drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and EEMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEMQ	EEMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.72%	-48.47%	-22.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.94%	-14.75%	-7.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.94%	-26.06%	+4.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.02%	-34.03%	-31.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.14%	-1.32%	-26.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.69%	-20.17%	-15.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.20%	3.67%	+4.53%

Volatility

KEMQ vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) is 10.09%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that KEMQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEMQ	EEMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.09%	14.32%	-4.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.87%	22.10%	-1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.14%	24.45%	+1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.88%	19.33%	+12.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.58%	21.59%	+7.99%

KEMQ vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

KEMQ vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than EEMO's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	1.64%	2.31%	2.57%	3.65%	3.82%	1.51%	1.53%	2.13%	13.10%	5.13%	1.55%	2.92%
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	4.92%	5.27%	0.73%	0.29%	0.00%	0.28%	2.28%	1.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KEMQ and EEMO in my portfolio?

KEMQ and EEMO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KEMQ or EEMO?

EEMO has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to KEMQ (10.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMQ dropped -70.72% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

Which ETF is better, KEMQ or EEMO?

On 5-year performance, EEMO leads with 7.19% vs -2.87% for KEMQ. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, KEMQ has been the lower-risk option at 10.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KEMQ or EEMO?

Over the 5-year period, EEMO has performed better with a 7.19% return vs -2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KEMQ or EEMO?

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KEMQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KEMQ or EEMO?

KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 1.64% for EEMO.

What is the main difference between KEMQ and EEMO?

KEMQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEMO is Momentum. KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for KEMQ and 0.31% for EEMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.