EEMO vs. IDMO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - EEMO tracks the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index while IDMO tracks the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMO returned 6.35%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for IDMO. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EEMO charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.

Performance

EEMO vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a 13.88% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMO has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 6.35%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.52% annualized return.

EEMO

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -11.19%
• 6M: 8.68%
• YTD: 13.88%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 13.43%
• 5Y*: 4.39%
• 10Y*: 6.35%
• ALL TIME*: 1.62%

IDMO

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.83%
• 6M: 6.43%
• YTD: 10.66%
• 1Y: 24.64%
• 3Y*: 25.15%
• 5Y*: 15.47%
• 10Y*: 12.52%
• ALL TIME*: 9.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	$285.36K	$494.03K	$516.10K
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF	$22.05M	$20.41M	$22.89M

EEMO vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	13.88%	10.99%	9.88%	13.90%	-18.73%	-5.57%	9.66%	21.17%	-17.24%	49.65%
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF	10.66%	42.17%	12.79%	20.16%	-12.03%	14.31%	22.01%	26.09%	-16.66%	29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMO and IDMO is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012	0.48

Over the past year, EEMO and IDMO have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.

EEMO vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEMO	IDMO
Technology	56.8%	0.5%
Financial Services	15.0%	11.9%
Basic Materials	9.6%	4.7%
Industrials	8.2%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	0.0%
Healthcare	2.2%	0.5%
Energy	1.7%	0.6%
Utilities	1.4%	0.2%
Communication Services	1.3%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	0.4%
Real Estate	0.3%	0.3%

Return for Risk

EEMO vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEMO

EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 27
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 32

IDMO

IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 55
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEMO vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEMO	IDMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	1.25	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	1.88	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.23	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.72	1.95	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.94	7.47	-4.52

EEMO vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMO and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEMO vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and IDMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMO	IDMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.47%	-39.38%	-9.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.41%	-12.31%	-15.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.41%	-12.65%	-14.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.59%	-27.07%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.57%	-31.34%	-15.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.95%	-1.81%	-21.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.08%	-9.68%	-10.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.74%	3.22%	+3.52%

Volatility

EEMO vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a higher volatility of 16.65% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) at 7.12%. This indicates that EEMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEMO	IDMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.65%	7.12%	+9.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.96%	17.57%	+16.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.14%	19.20%	+15.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.09%	18.24%	+3.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.02%	17.97%	+5.05%

EEMO vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEMO vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than IDMO's 3.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	1.99%	2.31%	2.57%	3.65%	3.82%	1.51%	1.53%	2.13%	13.10%	5.13%	1.55%	2.92%
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF	3.61%	3.71%	2.24%	2.89%	3.66%	1.81%	1.63%	2.78%	3.27%	3.08%	2.18%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEMO and IDMO in my portfolio?

EEMO and IDMO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EEMO or IDMO?

EEMO has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to IDMO (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMO dropped -48.47% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

Which ETF is better, EEMO or IDMO?

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.52% vs 6.35% for EEMO. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EEMO or IDMO?

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 6.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEMO or IDMO?

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EEMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEMO or IDMO?

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 1.99% for EEMO.

What is the main difference between EEMO and IDMO?

EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EEMO and 0.25% for IDMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.