EEMO vs. EEMS

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and EEMS (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index, while EEMS is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMO returned 7.06%/yr vs 8.11%/yr for EEMS. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EEMO charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for EEMS.

Performance

EEMO vs. EEMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a 21.69% return, which is significantly higher than EEMS's 9.52% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMO has underperformed EEMS with an annualized return of 7.06%, while EEMS has yielded a comparatively higher 8.11% annualized return.

EEMO

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -9.44%
• 6M: 16.38%
• YTD: 21.69%
• 1Y: 26.52%
• 3Y*: 16.38%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 7.06%
• ALL TIME*: 2.09%

EEMS

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -3.13%
• 6M: 2.35%
• YTD: 9.52%
• 1Y: 17.24%
• 3Y*: 12.86%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 8.11%
• ALL TIME*: 5.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	$445.31K	$393.75K	$545.57K
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF	$2.58M	$5.31M	$6.33M

EEMO vs. EEMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	21.69%	10.99%	9.88%	13.90%	-18.73%	-5.57%	9.66%	21.17%	-17.24%	49.65%
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF	9.52%	19.78%	3.13%	23.09%	-19.12%	18.12%	19.47%	11.25%	-18.98%	34.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMO and EEMS is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012	0.65

The correlation between EEMO and EEMS shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEMO vs. EEMS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEMO	EEMS
Technology	56.8%	26.4%
Financial Services	15.0%	10.3%
Basic Materials	9.6%	8.5%
Industrials	8.2%	18.3%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	10.3%
Healthcare	2.2%	8.6%
Energy	1.7%	2.0%
Utilities	1.4%	2.7%
Communication Services	1.3%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	4.9%
Real Estate	0.3%	5.6%

Return for Risk

EEMO vs. EEMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEMO

EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 30
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 34

EEMS

EEMS Risk / Return Rank: 32
EEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
EEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
EEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 32
EEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
EEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEMO vs. EEMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEMO	EEMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	0.86	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	1.26	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.17	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	1.30	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.77	4.12	-0.35

EEMO vs. EEMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the EEMS Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMO and EEMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEMO vs. EEMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, roughly equal to the maximum EEMS drawdown of -48.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and EEMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMO	EEMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.47%	-48.89%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.41%	-13.31%	-14.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.41%	-19.71%	-7.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.59%	-27.07%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.57%	-48.89%	+2.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.67%	-6.76%	-10.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.08%	-10.46%	-9.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.06%	4.19%	+2.87%

Volatility

EEMO vs. EEMS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a higher volatility of 15.83% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) at 7.29%. This indicates that EEMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEMO	EEMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.83%	7.29%	+8.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.24%	18.67%	+15.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.49%	20.25%	+15.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.22%	16.80%	+5.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.09%	18.22%	+4.87%

EEMO vs. EEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMS's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEMO vs. EEMS - Dividend Comparison

EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than EEMS's 2.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	1.87%	2.31%	2.57%	3.65%	3.82%	1.51%	1.53%	2.13%	13.10%	5.13%	1.55%	2.92%
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF	2.91%	3.09%	2.60%	2.69%	0.89%	3.56%	2.14%	2.64%	3.06%	2.47%	2.51%	2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEMO and EEMS in my portfolio?

EEMO and EEMS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EEMO or EEMS?

EEMO has higher volatility (15.83%) compared to EEMS (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMO dropped -48.47% vs EEMS's -48.89%.

Which ETF is better, EEMO or EEMS?

On 10-year performance, EEMS leads with 8.11% vs 7.06% for EEMO. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, EEMS has been the lower-risk option at 7.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EEMO or EEMS?

Over the 10-year period, EEMS has performed better with a 8.11% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEMO or EEMS?

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for EEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEMO or EEMS?

EEMS has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.87% for EEMO.

What is the main difference between EEMO and EEMS?

EEMO is categorized as Momentum, while EEMS is Emerging Markets Equities. EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index, while EEMS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EEMO and 0.73% for EEMS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.