PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEMQ vs. EBIZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KEMQ
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
-9.82%56.28%13.81%0.77%-38.09%-27.31%39.26%28.26%-5.96%
EBIZ
Global X E-commerce ETF
-17.73%17.74%31.26%30.88%-40.96%-13.26%74.39%32.76%-11.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a -9.82% return, which is significantly higher than EBIZ's -17.73% return.


KEMQ

1D
-1.58%
1M
-5.71%
YTD
-9.82%
6M
-13.51%
1Y
26.83%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
-6.35%
10Y*

EBIZ

1D
0.07%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
-17.73%
6M
-24.37%
1Y
0.53%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
-5.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EBIZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KEMQ vs. EBIZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMQ
KEMQ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
KEMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

EBIZ
EBIZ Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EBIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EBIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KEMQEBIZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

-0.25

+1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

-0.19

+1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.98

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

-0.19

+1.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.62

-0.52

+4.14

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the EBIZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMQ and EBIZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KEMQEBIZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

-0.25

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

-0.18

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.28

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between KEMQ and EBIZ is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Dividend Comparison

KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than EBIZ's 0.62% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
KEMQ
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
5.84%5.27%0.73%0.29%0.00%0.28%2.28%1.76%
EBIZ
Global X E-commerce ETF
0.62%0.51%0.23%0.00%0.10%0.57%0.84%0.18%

Drawdowns

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, which is greater than EBIZ's maximum drawdown of -61.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and EBIZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KEMQEBIZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.72%

-61.58%

-9.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.94%

-27.73%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.39%

-59.73%

-6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.43%

-27.90%

-11.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.75%

-24.33%

-11.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.85%

10.34%

-3.49%

Volatility

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a higher volatility of 10.27% compared to Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) at 7.23%. This indicates that KEMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBIZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KEMQEBIZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.27%

7.23%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.65%

15.74%

+3.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.24%

24.50%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.60%

28.97%

+2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.53%

28.86%

+0.67%