PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEMQ vs. EBIZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly higher than EBIZ's -15.29% return.


KEMQ

1D
-2.81%
1M
7.12%
YTD
6.99%
6M
8.35%
1Y
36.95%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
-2.87%
10Y*

EBIZ

1D
-2.05%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
-15.29%
6M
-15.50%
1Y
-8.74%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
-3.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KEMQ
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
6.99%56.28%13.81%0.77%-38.09%-27.31%39.26%28.26%-5.96%
EBIZ
Global X E-commerce ETF
-15.29%17.74%31.26%30.88%-40.96%-13.26%74.39%32.76%-11.01%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMQ and EBIZ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2018

0.78

The correlation between KEMQ and EBIZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KEMQ
EBIZ

Technology

45.0%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

33.0%
75.6%

Communication Services

15.5%
1.6%

Healthcare

3.5%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.3%

Industrials

-

4.6%

Real Estate

-

2.6%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

KEMQ
45.0%
EBIZ
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

KEMQ
33.0%
EBIZ
75.6%

Communication Services

KEMQ
15.5%
EBIZ
1.6%

Healthcare

KEMQ
3.5%
EBIZ
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

KEMQ
0.4%
EBIZ

-

Basic Materials

KEMQ

-

EBIZ

-

Energy

KEMQ

-

EBIZ

-

Financial Services

KEMQ

-

EBIZ
0.3%

Industrials

KEMQ

-

EBIZ
4.6%

Real Estate

KEMQ

-

EBIZ
2.6%

Utilities

KEMQ

-

EBIZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEMQ vs. EBIZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMQ
KEMQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
KEMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

EBIZ
EBIZ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EBIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EBIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KEMQEBIZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.94

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

-0.32

+2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.52

-0.65

+5.17

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the EBIZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMQ and EBIZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KEMQEBIZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

-0.44

+1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

-0.13

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.29

-0.23

Drawdowns

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, which is greater than EBIZ's maximum drawdown of -61.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and EBIZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEMQEBIZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.72%

-61.58%

-9.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.94%

-27.73%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.94%

-27.73%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.02%

-58.21%

-7.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.14%

-25.77%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.69%

-24.33%

-11.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.20%

13.41%

-5.21%

Volatility

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) at 5.39%. This indicates that KEMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBIZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEMQEBIZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.09%

5.39%

+4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.87%

15.01%

+5.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.14%

19.82%

+6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.88%

28.90%

+2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

28.68%

+0.90%

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EBIZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

KEMQ vs. EBIZ - Dividend Comparison

KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than EBIZ's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EBIZ
Global X E-commerce ETF
0.60%0.51%0.23%0.00%0.10%0.57%0.84%0.18%
KEMQ
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
4.92%5.27%0.73%0.29%0.00%0.28%2.28%1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


KEMQ and EBIZ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEMQ has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to EBIZ (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMQ dropped -70.72% vs EBIZ's -61.58%.

On 5-year performance, KEMQ leads with -2.87% vs -3.65% for EBIZ. On fees, EBIZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EBIZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KEMQ has performed better with a -2.87% return vs -3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EBIZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KEMQ.

KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 0.60% for EBIZ.

KEMQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EBIZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index, while EBIZ tracks Solactive E-commerce Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for KEMQ and 0.50% for EBIZ.

KEMQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEMQ and EBIZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer