PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMO vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMO vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a 13.88% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 21.07% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMO has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 6.35%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.57% annualized return.


EEMO

1D
-0.40%
1M
-11.19%
6M
8.68%
YTD
13.88%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
6.35%
ALL TIME*
1.62%

SPMO

1D
0.29%
1M
-4.64%
6M
20.51%
YTD
21.07%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
37.36%
5Y*
20.21%
10Y*
19.57%
ALL TIME*
18.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$285.36K$494.03K$516.10K
$331.54M$346.70M$350.59M

EEMO vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
13.88%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-17.24%49.65%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
21.07%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMO and SPMO is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.55

The correlation between EEMO and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEMO vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMO
SPMO

Technology

56.8%
53.7%

Financial Services

15.0%
6.0%

Basic Materials

9.6%
1.9%

Industrials

8.2%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
1.2%

Healthcare

2.2%
6.9%

Energy

1.7%
3.3%

Utilities

1.4%
2.7%

Communication Services

1.3%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
4.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.1%

Technology

EEMO
56.8%
SPMO
53.7%

Financial Services

EEMO
15.0%
SPMO
6.0%

Basic Materials

EEMO
9.6%
SPMO
1.9%

Industrials

EEMO
8.2%
SPMO
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMO
2.6%
SPMO
1.2%

Healthcare

EEMO
2.2%
SPMO
6.9%

Energy

EEMO
1.7%
SPMO
3.3%

Utilities

EEMO
1.4%
SPMO
2.7%

Communication Services

EEMO
1.3%
SPMO
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

EEMO
0.9%
SPMO
4.2%

Real Estate

EEMO
0.3%
SPMO
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMO vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEMO vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMOSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.21

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

1.63

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.94

5.93

-2.99

EEMO vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMO and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEMO vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMOSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.47%

-30.95%

-17.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.41%

-15.64%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-20.13%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-22.74%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

-30.95%

-15.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.95%

-11.03%

-11.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.08%

-4.62%

-15.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.74%

4.29%

+2.45%

Volatility

EEMO vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a higher volatility of 16.65% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.53%. This indicates that EEMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMOSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.65%

10.53%

+6.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.96%

21.52%

+12.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.14%

23.90%

+11.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.09%

20.60%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

20.92%

+2.10%

EEMO vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMO vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than SPMO's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.99%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.73%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMO and SPMO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to SPMO (10.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMO dropped -48.47% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 19.57% vs 6.35% for EEMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 6.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EEMO.

EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.73% for SPMO.

EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EEMO and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMO and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer