PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMO vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMO vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a 35.52% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 29.91% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMO has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 8.71%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.03% annualized return.


EEMO

1D
-8.31%
1M
6.72%
YTD
35.52%
6M
35.05%
1Y
47.55%
3Y*
23.13%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
8.71%

SPMO

1D
-4.53%
1M
6.65%
YTD
29.91%
6M
28.13%
1Y
43.55%
3Y*
42.47%
5Y*
22.89%
10Y*
21.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMO vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
35.52%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-17.24%49.65%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
29.91%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMO and SPMO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.54

The correlation between EEMO and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEMO vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMO
SPMO

Technology

53.0%
56.8%

Financial Services

15.4%
5.8%

Basic Materials

9.9%
1.5%

Industrials

7.5%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.8%
1.1%

Healthcare

2.3%
5.9%

Communication Services

1.2%
8.0%

Utilities

1.0%
2.6%

Energy

0.8%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
3.8%

Real Estate

0.3%
0.9%

Technology

EEMO
53.0%
SPMO
56.8%

Financial Services

EEMO
15.4%
SPMO
5.8%

Basic Materials

EEMO
9.9%
SPMO
1.5%

Industrials

EEMO
7.5%
SPMO
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMO
2.8%
SPMO
1.1%

Healthcare

EEMO
2.3%
SPMO
5.9%

Communication Services

EEMO
1.2%
SPMO
8.0%

Utilities

EEMO
1.0%
SPMO
2.6%

Energy

EEMO
0.8%
SPMO
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

EEMO
0.6%
SPMO
3.8%

Real Estate

EEMO
0.3%
SPMO
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMO vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMO vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMOSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.45

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

12.97

-1.17

EEMO vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMO and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEMO vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMOSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.47%

-30.95%

-17.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-12.70%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.06%

-20.13%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.03%

-22.74%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

-30.95%

-15.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.31%

-4.53%

-3.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.11%

-4.59%

-15.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

3.37%

+0.67%

Volatility

EEMO vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a higher volatility of 20.47% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 11.75%. This indicates that EEMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMOSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.47%

11.75%

+8.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.78%

17.78%

+11.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.30%

20.55%

+9.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.93%

19.88%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.33%

20.60%

+1.73%

EEMO vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMO vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than SPMO's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.67%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.68%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMO and SPMO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (20.47%) compared to SPMO (11.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMO dropped -48.47% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 21.03% vs 8.71% for EEMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 11.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 21.03% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EEMO.

EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.68% for SPMO.

EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EEMO and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMO and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer