PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMO vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMO vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a 13.88% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 9.41% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMO has underperformed VWO with an annualized return of 6.35%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.86% annualized return.


EEMO

1D
-0.40%
1M
-11.19%
6M
8.68%
YTD
13.88%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
6.35%
ALL TIME*
1.62%

VWO

1D
0.96%
1M
-0.49%
6M
4.16%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
21.69%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
7.86%
ALL TIME*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$285.36K$494.03K$516.10K
$386.61M$469.40M$499.89M

EEMO vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
13.88%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-17.24%49.65%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
9.41%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMO and VWO is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012

0.69

The correlation between EEMO and VWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEMO vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMO
VWO

Technology

56.8%
34.2%

Financial Services

15.0%
19.4%

Basic Materials

9.6%
7.2%

Industrials

8.2%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
9.1%

Healthcare

2.2%
3.7%

Energy

1.7%
3.8%

Utilities

1.4%
2.8%

Communication Services

1.3%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
3.3%

Real Estate

0.3%
2.0%

Technology

EEMO
56.8%
VWO
34.2%

Financial Services

EEMO
15.0%
VWO
19.4%

Basic Materials

EEMO
9.6%
VWO
7.2%

Industrials

EEMO
8.2%
VWO
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMO
2.6%
VWO
9.1%

Healthcare

EEMO
2.2%
VWO
3.7%

Energy

EEMO
1.7%
VWO
3.8%

Utilities

EEMO
1.4%
VWO
2.8%

Communication Services

EEMO
1.3%
VWO
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

EEMO
0.9%
VWO
3.3%

Real Estate

EEMO
0.3%
VWO
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMO vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEMO vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMOVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

1.89

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.94

6.16

-3.22

EEMO vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMO and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEMO vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMOVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.47%

-67.68%

+19.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.41%

-11.17%

-16.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-17.37%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-30.88%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

-36.39%

-10.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.95%

-4.07%

-18.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.08%

-15.73%

-4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.74%

3.43%

+3.31%

Volatility

EEMO vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a higher volatility of 16.65% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 5.58%. This indicates that EEMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMOVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.65%

5.58%

+11.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.96%

15.22%

+18.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.14%

17.58%

+17.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.09%

17.56%

+4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

19.17%

+3.85%

EEMO vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMO vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than VWO's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.99%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.35%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMO and VWO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to VWO (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMO dropped -48.47% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 10-year performance, VWO leads with 7.86% vs 6.35% for EEMO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VWO has performed better with a 7.86% return vs 6.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EEMO.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.99% for EEMO.

EEMO is categorized as Momentum, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EEMO and 0.08% for VWO.

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMO and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer