KEMQ vs. KWEB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KEMQ (KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index, while KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KEMQ returned -4.14%/yr vs -15.81%/yr for KWEB. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KEMQ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.

Performance

KEMQ vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -28.08% return.

KEMQ

• 1D: -3.77%
• 1M: 1.99%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 6M: 2.85%
• 1Y: 21.94%
• 3Y*: 22.94%
• 5Y*: -4.14%
• 10Y*: —

KWEB

• 1D: -2.24%
• 1M: -8.99%
• YTD: -28.08%
• 6M: -29.18%
• 1Y: -22.79%
• 3Y*: 0.71%
• 5Y*: -15.81%
• 10Y*: -0.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMQ vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	2.13%	56.28%	13.81%	0.77%	-38.09%	-27.31%	39.26%	28.26%	-25.52%	1.43%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-28.08%	23.55%	12.01%	-9.06%	-17.24%	-49.01%	58.23%	29.92%	-33.80%	0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMQ and KWEB is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017	0.88

The correlation between KEMQ and KWEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

KEMQ vs. KWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KEMQ	KWEB
Technology	39.1%	17.5%
Consumer Cyclical	30.6%	36.0%
Communication Services	20.2%	28.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	2.7%
Healthcare	3.3%	6.0%
Financial Services	2.5%	2.0%
Industrials	2.1%	3.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	3.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KEMQ vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMQ

KEMQ Risk / Return Rank: 23
KEMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KEMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KEMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 24
KEMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
KEMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 3
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 3
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMQ vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KEMQ	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	-0.84	+1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	-1.15	+2.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.87	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	-0.58	+1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.59	-1.22	+3.81

KEMQ vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the KWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMQ and KWEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KEMQ vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and KWEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEMQ	KWEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.72%	-80.92%	+10.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.94%	-39.49%	+17.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.94%	-39.49%	+17.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.02%	-72.17%	+6.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.41%	-71.68%	+40.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.64%	-35.36%	-0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.49%	18.70%	-10.21%

Volatility

KEMQ vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a higher volatility of 11.75% compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) at 8.34%. This indicates that KEMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEMQ	KWEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.75%	8.34%	+3.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.87%	20.47%	+2.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.40%	27.17%	+0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.15%	47.70%	-15.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.67%	40.00%	-10.33%

KEMQ vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

KEMQ vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than KWEB's 8.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	5.16%	5.27%	0.73%	0.29%	0.00%	0.28%	2.28%	1.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	8.56%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KEMQ and KWEB in my portfolio?

KEMQ and KWEB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KEMQ or KWEB?

KEMQ has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to KWEB (8.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMQ dropped -70.72% vs KWEB's -80.92%.

Which ETF is better, KEMQ or KWEB?

On 5-year performance, KEMQ leads with -4.14% vs -15.81% for KWEB. On fees, KEMQ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, KWEB has been the lower-risk option at 8.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KEMQ or KWEB?

Over the 5-year period, KEMQ has performed better with a -4.14% return vs -15.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KEMQ or KWEB?

KEMQ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for KWEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KEMQ or KWEB?

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 8.56%, compared with 5.16% for KEMQ.

What is the main difference between KEMQ and KWEB?

KEMQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while KWEB is China Equities. KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index, while KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for KEMQ and 0.70% for KWEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEMQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.