KEMQ vs. KWEB
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB).
KEMQ and KWEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KEMQ is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. It was launched on Oct 11, 2017. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. Both KEMQ and KWEB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KEMQ or KWEB.
Correlation
The correlation between KEMQ and KWEB is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
KEMQ vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
KEMQ:
0.94
KWEB:
0.42
KEMQ:
1.57
KWEB:
1.01
KEMQ:
1.20
KWEB:
1.13
KEMQ:
0.48
KWEB:
0.28
KEMQ:
3.04
KWEB:
1.32
KEMQ:
9.78%
KWEB:
15.94%
KEMQ:
29.82%
KWEB:
42.03%
KEMQ:
-70.72%
KWEB:
-80.92%
KEMQ:
-47.07%
KWEB:
-61.60%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a 23.14% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's 20.45% return.
KEMQ
23.14%
14.00%
18.61%
27.57%
-0.67%
N/A
KWEB
20.45%
12.56%
19.48%
17.63%
-4.68%
0.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KEMQ vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KEMQ vs. KWEB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KEMQ
KWEB
KEMQ vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
KEMQ vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than KWEB's 2.91% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 0.60% | 0.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 2.28% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 2.91% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
KEMQ vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and KWEB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
KEMQ vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) is 6.24%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that KEMQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...