PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEMQ vs. TPYP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KEMQ vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 20.05% return.


KEMQ

1D
0.89%
1M
5.98%
YTD
6.13%
6M
6.59%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
-3.07%
10Y*

TPYP

1D
1.24%
1M
-4.81%
YTD
20.05%
6M
21.48%
1Y
23.32%
3Y*
25.65%
5Y*
17.96%
10Y*
11.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMQ vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KEMQ
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
6.13%56.28%13.81%0.77%-38.09%-27.31%39.26%28.26%-25.52%1.43%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
20.05%7.59%37.37%10.51%16.09%34.97%-20.99%23.35%-11.13%-0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMQ and TPYP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017

0.31

The correlation between KEMQ and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KEMQ vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KEMQ
TPYP

Technology

39.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

30.6%

-

Communication Services

20.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.3%

-

Healthcare

3.3%

-

Financial Services

2.5%
2.4%

Industrials

2.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Energy

-

68.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

22.0%

Technology

KEMQ
39.1%
TPYP

-

Consumer Cyclical

KEMQ
30.6%
TPYP

-

Communication Services

KEMQ
20.2%
TPYP

-

Consumer Defensive

KEMQ
3.3%
TPYP

-

Healthcare

KEMQ
3.3%
TPYP

-

Financial Services

KEMQ
2.5%
TPYP
2.4%

Industrials

KEMQ
2.1%
TPYP

-

Basic Materials

KEMQ

-

TPYP
0.1%

Energy

KEMQ

-

TPYP
68.8%

Real Estate

KEMQ

-

TPYP

-

Utilities

KEMQ

-

TPYP
22.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEMQ vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMQ
KEMQ Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
KEMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMQ vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KEMQTPYPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

3.42

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.42

8.48

-5.05

KEMQ vs. TPYP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the TPYP Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMQ and TPYP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KEMQ vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and TPYP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEMQTPYPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.72%

-51.91%

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.94%

-6.84%

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.94%

-13.17%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.02%

-17.96%

-48.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.72%

-5.28%

-23.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.64%

-7.88%

-27.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.46%

2.76%

+5.70%

Volatility

KEMQ vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 5.08%. This indicates that KEMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEMQTPYPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.02%

5.08%

+5.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.56%

10.33%

+12.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.18%

13.30%

+13.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.11%

17.39%

+14.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.65%

21.93%

+7.72%

KEMQ vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

KEMQ vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison

KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than TPYP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KEMQ
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
4.96%5.27%0.73%0.29%0.00%0.28%2.28%1.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.25%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


KEMQ and TPYP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEMQ has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to TPYP (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMQ dropped -70.72% vs TPYP's -51.91%.

On 5-year performance, TPYP leads with 17.96% vs -3.07% for KEMQ. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 17.96% return vs -3.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KEMQ.

KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 3.25% for TPYP.

KEMQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TPYP is Energy Equities. KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for KEMQ and 0.40% for TPYP.

TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEMQ and TPYP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer