PortfoliosLab logo
KEMQ vs. KLIP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KEMQ and KLIP is -0.80. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

KEMQ vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

KEMQ:

11.03%

KLIP:

8.26%

Max Drawdown

KEMQ:

-1.32%

KLIP:

-0.48%

Current Drawdown

KEMQ:

-1.28%

KLIP:

-0.03%

Returns By Period


KEMQ

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

KLIP

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KEMQ vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KEMQ vs. KLIP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KEMQ is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KEMQ is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KEMQ is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KEMQ is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KEMQ is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KEMQ is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

KLIP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KLIP is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KLIP is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KLIP is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KEMQ vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

KEMQ vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than KLIP's 42.26% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
KEMQ
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
42.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

KEMQ vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -1.32%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and KLIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

KEMQ vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...