KEMQ vs. KLIP
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP).
KEMQ and KLIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KEMQ is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. It was launched on Oct 11, 2017. KLIP is managed by CICC. It was launched on Jan 12, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KEMQ or KLIP.
Correlation
The correlation between KEMQ and KLIP is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
KEMQ vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KEMQ:
1.38
KLIP:
1.02
KEMQ:
2.07
KLIP:
1.49
KEMQ:
1.25
KLIP:
1.20
KEMQ:
0.56
KLIP:
1.68
KEMQ:
3.99
KLIP:
3.77
KEMQ:
9.02%
KLIP:
4.17%
KEMQ:
26.18%
KLIP:
15.41%
KEMQ:
-70.72%
KLIP:
-10.39%
KEMQ:
-52.04%
KLIP:
-0.21%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's 4.21% return.
KEMQ
11.60%
14.88%
18.71%
32.76%
-5.15%
N/A
KLIP
4.21%
9.27%
7.23%
13.93%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KEMQ vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KEMQ vs. KLIP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KEMQ
KLIP
KEMQ vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KEMQ vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison
KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than KLIP's 50.53% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 0.66% | 0.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 2.28% | 1.76% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 50.53% | 54.85% | 61.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KEMQ vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -10.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and KLIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KEMQ vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 3.61%. This indicates that KEMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.