KCOP vs. ATMP
KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) and ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - KCOP is a Copper fund actively managed by Kurv, while ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. KCOP is actively managed, while ATMP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. KCOP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ATMP.
Performance
KCOP vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KCOP
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -7.75%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 21.51%
- YTD
- 22.14%
- 1Y
- 21.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 4.46%
KCOP vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | -5.39% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 9.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCOP and ATMP is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCOP vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
KCOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ATMP
KCOP vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCOP | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCOP vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCOP drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCOP and ATMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCOP | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -80.86% | +59.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.46% | -4.41% | -9.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -30.94% | +21.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility
KCOP vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCOP | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.31% | 14.50% | +28.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.31% | 22.11% | +21.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.31% | 27.64% | +15.67% |
KCOP vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCOP vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, while ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% |
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 5.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCOP and ATMP have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATMP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATMP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KCOP.
KCOP has the higher dividend yield at 5.34%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.
KCOP is categorized as Copper, while ATMP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KCOP and 0.95% for ATMP.
Find the right allocation for KCOP and ATMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer