KCOP vs. COPX
KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both Copper funds. KCOP is actively managed, while COPX is passively managed. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. KCOP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
KCOP vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KCOP
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
COPX
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- 6M
- -6.70%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 89.44%
- 3Y*
- 27.01%
- 5Y*
- 18.54%
- 10Y*
- 18.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $193.89M | $197.23M | $300.83M | |
| $249.14K | $314.36K | $548.92K |
KCOP vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | -2.34% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | -9.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCOP and COPX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCOP vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
KCOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COPX
KCOP vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCOP | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCOP vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCOP drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCOP and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCOP | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -83.16% | +61.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.67% | -17.32% | +6.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.65% | -39.11% | +29.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.11% | — |
Volatility
KCOP vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCOP | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.43% | 45.77% | -3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.43% | 37.28% | +5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.43% | 35.87% | +6.56% |
KCOP vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCOP vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than COPX's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.45% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, KCOP and COPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KCOP.
KCOP has the higher dividend yield at 6.55%, compared with 2.45% for COPX.
They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KCOP and 0.65% for COPX.
Find the right allocation for KCOP and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer