KCOP vs. KGLD
KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) and KGLD (Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF ) are both exchange-traded funds - KCOP is a Copper fund actively managed by Kurv, while KGLD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KCOP charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for KGLD.
Performance
KCOP vs. KGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KCOP
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
KGLD
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- 6M
- -18.16%
- YTD
- -6.67%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $249.14K | $314.36K | $548.92K | |
| $2.66M | $2.33M | $2.61M |
KCOP vs. KGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | -2.34% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | -19.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCOP and KGLD is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCOP vs. KGLD — Risk / Return Rank
KCOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KGLD
KCOP vs. KGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCOP | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.63 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCOP vs. KGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCOP drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, smaller than the maximum KGLD drawdown of -28.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCOP and KGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCOP | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -28.32% | +6.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.67% | -26.95% | +16.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.65% | -8.98% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.19% | — |
Volatility
KCOP vs. KGLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCOP | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.43% | 29.22% | +13.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.43% | 28.40% | +14.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.43% | 28.40% | +14.03% |
KCOP vs. KGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than KGLD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCOP vs. KGLD - Dividend Comparison
KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, less than KGLD's 15.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 6.55% | 0.00% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 15.46% | 4.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCOP and KGLD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KCOP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KCOP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.
KGLD has the higher dividend yield at 15.46%, compared with 6.55% for KCOP.
KCOP is categorized as Copper, while KGLD is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KCOP and 1.00% for KGLD.
Find the right allocation for KCOP and KGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer