PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KALU vs. EQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

KALU vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KALU vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation
5.54%70.14%2.75%-2.14%-16.17%-2.44%-7.57%27.24%-14.68%40.65%
EQT
EQT Corporation
19.07%17.64%21.41%16.20%57.64%71.60%17.27%-41.82%-38.82%-12.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KALU:

$2.02B

EQT:

$39.75B

EPS

KALU:

$8.62

EQT:

$3.30

PE Ratio

KALU:

13.99

EQT:

19.30

PEG Ratio

KALU:

0.38

EQT:

0.13

PS Ratio

KALU:

0.59

EQT:

4.55

PB Ratio

KALU:

2.44

EQT:

1.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

KALU:

$3.37B

EQT:

$8.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KALU:

$257.40M

EQT:

$8.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

KALU:

$294.60M

EQT:

$5.89B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KALU achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's 19.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with KALU having a 6.83% annualized return and EQT not far behind at 6.68%.


KALU

1D
5.12%
1M
-7.40%
YTD
5.54%
6M
58.41%
1Y
105.95%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
6.83%

EQT

1D
-1.24%
1M
3.61%
YTD
19.07%
6M
17.60%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
27.75%
5Y*
29.08%
10Y*
6.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KALU vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KALU
KALU Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
KALU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KALU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
KALU Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
KALU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
KALU Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

EQT
EQT Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KALU vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KALUEQTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

0.57

+1.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

0.95

+2.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.13

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

1.17

+2.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.69

2.31

+7.38

KALU vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KALU Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KALU and EQT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KALUEQTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

0.57

+1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.67

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.14

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.32

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between KALU and EQT is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KALU vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

KALU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than EQT's 1.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation
2.56%2.68%4.38%4.33%4.05%3.07%2.71%2.16%2.46%1.87%2.32%1.91%
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.01%1.19%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%0.42%0.21%0.18%0.23%

Drawdowns

KALU vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KALU drawdown since its inception was -82.08%, smaller than the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KALU and EQT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KALUEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.08%

-91.51%

+9.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.03%

-18.39%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.48%

-42.56%

-15.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.48%

-88.28%

+29.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.72%

-6.32%

-10.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.78%

-23.38%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.43%

9.29%

+1.14%

Volatility

KALU vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) has a higher volatility of 13.47% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 8.04%. This indicates that KALU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KALUEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.47%

8.04%

+5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.51%

23.63%

+10.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.05%

35.89%

+10.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.24%

43.78%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.56%

48.95%

-7.39%

Financials

KALU vs. EQT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
929.00M
1.84B
(KALU) Total Revenue
(EQT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items