PortfoliosLab logo
KALU vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between KALU and COST is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

KALU vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KALU:

-0.56

COST:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

KALU:

-0.53

COST:

1.81

Omega Ratio

KALU:

0.93

COST:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

KALU:

-0.39

COST:

1.65

Martin Ratio

KALU:

-0.87

COST:

4.74

Ulcer Index

KALU:

25.96%

COST:

6.04%

Daily Std Dev

KALU:

43.12%

COST:

22.13%

Max Drawdown

KALU:

-82.08%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

KALU:

-39.23%

COST:

-3.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KALU:

$1.18B

COST:

$461.51B

EPS

KALU:

$3.04

COST:

$17.68

PE Ratio

KALU:

23.88

COST:

58.83

PEG Ratio

KALU:

2.24

COST:

5.51

PS Ratio

KALU:

0.39

COST:

1.72

PB Ratio

KALU:

1.56

COST:

18.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

KALU:

$3.06B

COST:

$205.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KALU:

$284.30M

COST:

$27.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

KALU:

$221.50M

COST:

$8.41B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KALU achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 13.80% return. Over the past 10 years, KALU has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 1.75%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 24.24% annualized return.


KALU

YTD

5.70%

1M

8.99%

6M

-8.62%

1Y

-22.53%

3Y*

-6.91%

5Y*

4.10%

10Y*

1.75%

COST

YTD

13.80%

1M

4.25%

6M

7.29%

1Y

29.10%

3Y*

32.50%

5Y*

29.64%

10Y*

24.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Kaiser Aluminum Corporation

Costco Wholesale Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KALU vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KALU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KALU is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KALU is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KALU is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KALU is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KALU is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KALU is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KALU vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KALU Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KALU and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

KALU vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

KALU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than COST's 0.46% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation
4.24%4.38%4.33%4.05%3.07%2.71%2.16%2.46%1.87%2.90%1.91%1.96%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.46%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

KALU vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KALU drawdown since its inception was -82.08%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KALU and COST.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

KALU vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.12%. This indicates that KALU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

KALU vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
777.40M
63.72B
(KALU) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KALU vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%20212022202320242025
13.4%
15.1%
(KALU) Gross Margin
(COST) Gross Margin
KALU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation reported a gross profit of 104.00M and revenue of 777.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.4%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.61B and revenue of 63.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

KALU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation reported an operating income of 41.40M and revenue of 777.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

KALU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation reported a net income of 21.60M and revenue of 777.40M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.