PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KALU vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

KALU vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KALU vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation
14.73%70.14%2.75%-2.14%-16.17%-2.44%-7.57%27.24%-14.68%40.65%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
15.72%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%

Fundamentals

EPS

KALU:

$8.62

COST:

$25.63

PE Ratio

KALU:

15.20

COST:

38.88

PEG Ratio

KALU:

0.41

COST:

3.04

PS Ratio

KALU:

0.65

COST:

1.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

KALU:

$3.37B

COST:

$286.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KALU:

$257.40M

COST:

$19.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

KALU:

$294.60M

COST:

$12.73B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KALU achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 15.72% return. Over the past 10 years, KALU has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 7.73%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.28% annualized return.


KALU

1D
8.71%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
14.73%
6M
69.62%
1Y
127.85%
3Y*
25.57%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
7.73%

COST

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
15.72%
6M
8.94%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
27.83%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
22.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KALU vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KALU
KALU Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
KALU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KALU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
KALU Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
KALU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
KALU Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KALU vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KALUCOSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.76

0.25

+2.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

0.50

+2.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.06

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.76

0.31

+4.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.94

0.61

+11.32

KALU vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KALU Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KALU and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KALUCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

0.25

+2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

1.08

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

1.02

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.59

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between KALU and COST is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KALU vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

KALU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than COST's 0.52% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation
2.35%2.68%4.38%4.33%4.05%3.07%2.71%2.16%2.46%1.87%2.32%1.91%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.52%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%

Drawdowns

KALU vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KALU drawdown since its inception was -82.08%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KALU and COST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KALUCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.08%

-53.39%

-28.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.03%

-19.35%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.48%

-31.40%

-27.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.48%

-31.40%

-27.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.47%

-6.95%

-2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.78%

-13.40%

-12.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.38%

9.67%

+0.71%

Volatility

KALU vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) has a higher volatility of 16.06% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.38%. This indicates that KALU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KALUCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.06%

4.38%

+11.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.41%

13.33%

+22.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.72%

20.08%

+26.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.41%

22.51%

+21.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.64%

21.90%

+19.74%

Financials

KALU vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
929.00M
69.60B
(KALU) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KALU vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-15.0%-10.0%-5.0%0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
-12.6%
Portfolio components
KALU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 929.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -8.80B and revenue of 69.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -12.6%.

KALU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation reported an operating income of 60.60M and revenue of 929.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.5%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.61B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

KALU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation reported a net income of 58.80M and revenue of 929.00M, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.