KALU vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KALU or COST.
Correlation
The correlation between KALU and COST is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KALU vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KALU:
0.48
COST:
2.43
KALU:
0.89
COST:
3.08
KALU:
1.12
COST:
1.43
KALU:
0.36
COST:
4.57
KALU:
0.92
COST:
10.69
KALU:
20.16%
COST:
4.39%
KALU:
39.18%
COST:
19.38%
KALU:
-82.08%
COST:
-53.39%
KALU:
-38.84%
COST:
-0.34%
Fundamentals
KALU:
$1.19B
COST:
$469.80B
KALU:
$2.90
COST:
$17.04
KALU:
25.50
COST:
62.11
KALU:
2.24
COST:
6.36
KALU:
$2.26B
COST:
$258.81B
KALU:
$166.60M
COST:
$32.80B
KALU:
$171.80M
COST:
$12.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KALU achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 15.63% return. Over the past 10 years, KALU has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 3.37%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 24.06% annualized return.
KALU
6.37%
6.46%
9.96%
17.43%
-2.99%
3.37%
COST
15.63%
13.08%
22.67%
47.30%
29.44%
24.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KALU vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KALU
COST
KALU vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KALU vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
KALU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than COST's 0.44% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KALU Kaiser Aluminum Corporation | 4.16% | 4.38% | 4.33% | 4.05% | 3.07% | 2.71% | 2.16% | 2.46% | 1.87% | 2.90% | 1.91% | 1.96% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.44% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% |
Drawdowns
KALU vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KALU drawdown since its inception was -82.08%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KALU and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KALU vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.66%. This indicates that KALU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
KALU vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities