KALU vs. EME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KALU (Kaiser Aluminum Corporation) and EME (EMCOR Group, Inc.) are both stocks. KALU operates in Aluminum (Basic Materials), while EME operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, KALU returned 11.24%/yr vs 33.77%/yr for EME. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KALU vs. EME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KALU achieves a 63.95% return, which is significantly higher than EME's 37.38% return. Over the past 10 years, KALU has underperformed EME with an annualized return of 11.24%, while EME has yielded a comparatively higher 33.77% annualized return.

KALU

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: 9.98%
• YTD: 63.95%
• 6M: 80.91%
• 1Y: 149.26%
• 3Y*: 45.72%
• 5Y*: 11.33%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

EME

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: -7.77%
• YTD: 37.38%
• 6M: 37.33%
• 1Y: 73.87%
• 3Y*: 69.67%
• 5Y*: 46.30%
• 10Y*: 33.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KALU vs. EME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KALU Kaiser Aluminum Corporation	63.95%	70.14%	2.75%	-2.14%	-16.17%	-2.44%	-7.57%	27.24%	-14.68%	40.65%
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	37.38%	35.05%	111.27%	46.03%	16.81%	39.93%	6.47%	45.18%	-26.68%	16.09%

Correlation

The correlation between KALU and EME is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2006	0.49

The correlation between KALU and EME shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap KALU : $3.14B EME : $37.82B
EPS KALU : $9.20 EME : $29.65
PE Ratio KALU : 20.24 EME : 28.32
PEG Ratio KALU : 0.55 EME : 0.66
PS Ratio KALU : 0.84 EME : 2.13
PB Ratio KALU : 3.58 EME : 9.78
Total Revenue (TTM) KALU : $3.70B EME : $17.75B
Gross Profit (TTM) KALU : $379.10M EME : $3.47B
EBITDA (TTM) KALU : $380.80M EME : $2.03B

Return for Risk

KALU vs. EME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KALU

KALU Risk / Return Rank: 93
KALU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
KALU Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
KALU Omega Ratio Rank: 92
KALU Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
KALU Martin Ratio Rank: 92

EME

EME Risk / Return Rank: 83
EME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EME Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EME Omega Ratio Rank: 84
EME Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
EME Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KALU vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KALU	EME	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.36	1.96	+1.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.10	2.37	+1.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.35	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.77	2.95	+2.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.70	7.46	+7.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KALU vs. EME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KALU Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the EME Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KALU and EME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KALU	EME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36	1.96	+1.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	1.40	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	1.03	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.60	-0.34

Drawdowns

KALU vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KALU drawdown since its inception was -82.08%, which is greater than EME's maximum drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KALU and EME.

Drawdown Indicators

	KALU	EME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.08%	-70.56%	-11.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.03%	-25.15%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.85%	-36.19%	-12.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.59%	-36.19%	-21.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.48%	-48.00%	-10.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	-11.04%	+8.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.58%	-15.37%	-10.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.19%	9.94%	+0.25%

Volatility

KALU vs. EME - Volatility Comparison

Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) has a higher volatility of 12.45% compared to EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) at 7.27%. This indicates that KALU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KALU	EME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.45%	7.27%	+5.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.36%	25.45%	+6.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.68%	37.97%	+6.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.53%	33.27%	+11.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.97%	32.94%	+9.03%

Dividends

KALU vs. EME - Dividend Comparison

KALU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than EME's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	0.15%	0.16%	0.20%	0.32%	0.36%	0.41%	0.35%	0.37%	0.54%	0.39%	0.45%	0.67%
KALU Kaiser Aluminum Corporation	1.65%	2.68%	4.38%	4.33%	4.05%	3.07%	2.71%	2.16%	2.46%	1.87%	2.32%	1.91%

Financials

KALU vs. EME - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and EMCOR Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KALU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation reported a gross profit of 133.20M and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.0%.

EME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 863.95M and revenue of 4.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.7%.

KALU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation reported an operating income of 97.80M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

EME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 403.85M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

KALU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation reported a net income of 62.50M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

EME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a net income of 305.48M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KALU and EME in my portfolio?

KALU and EME have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KALU or EME?

KALU has higher volatility (12.45%) compared to EME (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KALU dropped -82.08% vs EME's -70.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KALU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.