PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSML vs. ISCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSML vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSML achieves a 19.06% return, which is significantly higher than ISCG's 12.92% return. Over the past 10 years, JSML has outperformed ISCG with an annualized return of 12.88%, while ISCG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.37% annualized return.


JSML

1D
-0.84%
1M
7.59%
YTD
19.06%
6M
17.83%
1Y
33.64%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
12.88%

ISCG

1D
-0.93%
1M
3.29%
YTD
12.92%
6M
12.57%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSML vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
19.06%13.41%12.45%30.09%-29.40%3.08%35.38%32.50%-2.53%20.93%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
12.92%12.88%13.35%23.13%-26.75%-1.26%43.41%27.66%-6.91%24.68%

Correlation

The correlation between JSML and ISCG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2016

0.87

The correlation between JSML and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSML vs. ISCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSML
ISCG

Technology

24.8%
21.4%

Industrials

23.4%
24.6%

Healthcare

20.9%
15.4%

Financial Services

9.2%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
9.9%

Real Estate

3.4%
5.2%

Basic Materials

2.9%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
2.9%

Energy

2.2%
2.8%

Communication Services

2.1%
2.8%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Technology

JSML
24.8%
ISCG
21.4%

Industrials

JSML
23.4%
ISCG
24.6%

Healthcare

JSML
20.9%
ISCG
15.4%

Financial Services

JSML
9.2%
ISCG
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

JSML
5.8%
ISCG
9.9%

Real Estate

JSML
3.4%
ISCG
5.2%

Basic Materials

JSML
2.9%
ISCG
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

JSML
2.6%
ISCG
2.9%

Energy

JSML
2.2%
ISCG
2.8%

Communication Services

JSML
2.1%
ISCG
2.8%

Utilities

JSML

-

ISCG
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSML vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSML
JSML Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
JSML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSML Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSML Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
JSML Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSML Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCG
ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSML vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JSMLISCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.69

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

10.31

-2.22

JSML vs. ISCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSML Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the ISCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSML and ISCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JSMLISCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.70

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.23

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.49

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.41

+0.15

Drawdowns

JSML vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, smaller than the maximum ISCG drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and ISCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMLISCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.65%

-57.72%

+18.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.84%

-11.43%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.60%

-26.71%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.91%

-37.80%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.65%

-41.48%

+1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.93%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-11.63%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

2.98%

+1.19%

Volatility

JSML vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) at 4.93%. This indicates that JSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMLISCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.49%

4.93%

+2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.94%

13.09%

+2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.56%

18.13%

+3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.34%

22.95%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.27%

23.16%

+1.11%

JSML vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSML vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison

JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than ISCG's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.56%0.61%0.84%0.77%0.92%0.62%0.10%0.27%0.40%0.52%1.19%0.64%
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.80%0.94%1.19%0.49%0.67%0.46%0.30%0.27%0.76%0.42%0.52%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, JSML and ISCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JSML has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to ISCG (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs ISCG's -57.72%.

On 10-year performance, JSML leads with 12.88% vs 11.37% for ISCG. On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JSML has performed better with a 12.88% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSML.

JSML has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.56% for ISCG.

JSML tracks Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 0.06% for ISCG.

ISCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSML and ISCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer