PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSML vs. IJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSML vs. IJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSML achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 21.59% return. Over the past 10 years, JSML has outperformed IJR with an annualized return of 12.46%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.86% annualized return.


JSML

1D
-1.00%
1M
-3.94%
6M
15.68%
YTD
19.28%
1Y
30.82%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
12.46%
ALL TIME*
13.28%

IJR

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.70%
6M
15.04%
YTD
21.59%
1Y
35.87%
3Y*
13.39%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
10.86%
ALL TIME*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$499.82M$465.35M$539.29M
$2.69M$2.81M$2.16M

JSML vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
19.28%13.41%12.45%30.09%-29.40%3.08%35.38%32.50%-2.53%20.93%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
21.59%5.89%8.63%16.06%-16.20%26.58%11.28%22.82%-8.51%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between JSML and IJR is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.83

The correlation between JSML and IJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSML vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSML
IJR

Technology

26.3%
15.5%

Healthcare

22.8%
12.4%

Industrials

22.0%
15.6%

Financial Services

10.5%
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
13.2%

Basic Materials

2.7%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
4.2%

Real Estate

2.0%
7.6%

Energy

1.8%
4.9%

Communication Services

1.7%
3.2%

Utilities

-

1.8%

Technology

JSML
26.3%
IJR
15.5%

Healthcare

JSML
22.8%
IJR
12.4%

Industrials

JSML
22.0%
IJR
15.6%

Financial Services

JSML
10.5%
IJR
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

JSML
7.6%
IJR
13.2%

Basic Materials

JSML
2.7%
IJR
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

JSML
2.5%
IJR
4.2%

Real Estate

JSML
2.0%
IJR
7.6%

Energy

JSML
1.8%
IJR
4.9%

Communication Services

JSML
1.7%
IJR
3.2%

Utilities

JSML

-

IJR
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSML vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JSML
JSML Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
JSML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSML Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSML Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JSML Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSML Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JSML vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSMLIJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

3.89

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.56

13.29

-6.73

JSML vs. IJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSML Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the IJR Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSML and IJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSML vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, smaller than the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and IJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMLIJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.65%

-58.15%

+18.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.84%

-8.68%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.60%

-28.02%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.91%

-28.02%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.65%

-44.36%

+4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.22%

-1.92%

-4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.74%

-9.23%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

2.54%

+1.83%

Volatility

JSML vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) at 3.40%. This indicates that JSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMLIJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

3.40%

+2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.70%

11.62%

+6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.70%

17.33%

+5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.51%

21.25%

+3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.29%

22.85%

+1.44%

JSML vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSML vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison

JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than IJR's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.13%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.62%0.94%1.19%0.49%0.67%0.46%0.30%0.27%0.76%0.42%0.52%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSML and IJR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSML has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to IJR (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs IJR's -58.15%.

On 10-year performance, JSML leads with 12.46% vs 10.86% for IJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JSML has performed better with a 12.46% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSML.

IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.62% for JSML.

JSML is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while IJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. JSML tracks Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 0.06% for IJR.

IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSML and IJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer