JSML vs. IJR
JSML (Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JSML is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while IJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JSML returned 13.77%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for IJR. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JSML charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IJR.
Performance
JSML vs. IJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSML achieves a 25.69% return, which is significantly higher than IJR's 19.75% return. Over the past 10 years, JSML has outperformed IJR with an annualized return of 13.77%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.34% annualized return.
JSML
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 9.04%
- YTD
- 25.69%
- 6M
- 21.85%
- 1Y
- 41.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 13.77%
IJR
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 19.75%
- 6M
- 16.72%
- 1Y
- 36.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
JSML vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 25.69% | 13.41% | 12.45% | 30.09% | -29.40% | 3.08% | 35.38% | 32.50% | -2.53% | 20.93% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 19.75% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 11.28% | 22.82% | -8.51% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSML and IJR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016 | 0.84 |
The correlation between JSML and IJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSML vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSML
IJR
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Technology
JSML
IJR
Industrials
JSML
IJR
Healthcare
JSML
IJR
Financial Services
JSML
IJR
Consumer Cyclical
JSML
IJR
Basic Materials
JSML
IJR
Communication Services
JSML
IJR
Real Estate
JSML
IJR
Energy
JSML
IJR
Consumer Defensive
JSML
IJR
Utilities
JSML
-
IJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSML vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank
JSML
IJR
JSML vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JSML | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 4.25 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.04 | 14.27 | -4.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JSML vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, smaller than the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and IJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSML | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.65% | -58.15% | +18.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.84% | -8.68% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.60% | -28.02% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.91% | -28.02% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.65% | -44.36% | +4.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.09% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -9.26% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 2.58% | +1.60% |
Volatility
JSML vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) at 4.92%. This indicates that JSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSML | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 4.92% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.87% | 12.05% | +4.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.26% | 17.76% | +4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 21.40% | +3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 22.93% | +1.40% |
JSML vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSML vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison
JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than IJR's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.15% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.76% | 0.94% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSML and IJR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSML has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to IJR (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs IJR's -58.15%.
On 10-year performance, JSML leads with 13.77% vs 11.34% for IJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JSML has performed better with a 13.77% return vs 11.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSML.
IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.76% for JSML.
JSML is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while IJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. JSML tracks Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 0.06% for IJR.
IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSML and IJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer