PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCG vs. VBK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCG vs. VBK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCG achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly lower than VBK's 16.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISCG having a 11.69% annualized return and VBK not far ahead at 11.89%.


ISCG

1D
-0.86%
1M
4.84%
YTD
14.22%
6M
13.57%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
11.69%

VBK

1D
-1.27%
1M
4.37%
YTD
16.74%
6M
16.71%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCG vs. VBK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
14.22%12.88%13.35%23.13%-26.75%-1.26%43.41%27.66%-6.91%24.68%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
16.74%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCG and VBK is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2004

0.95

The correlation between ISCG and VBK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCG vs. VBK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISCG
VBK

Industrials

25.2%
24.7%

Technology

23.6%
25.9%

Healthcare

14.5%
15.3%

Financial Services

10.6%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
9.6%

Real Estate

5.1%
3.9%

Basic Materials

3.0%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
2.4%

Energy

2.8%
4.8%

Communication Services

2.4%
3.5%

Utilities

0.9%
1.2%

Industrials

ISCG
25.2%
VBK
24.7%

Technology

ISCG
23.6%
VBK
25.9%

Healthcare

ISCG
14.5%
VBK
15.3%

Financial Services

ISCG
10.6%
VBK
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ISCG
8.9%
VBK
9.6%

Real Estate

ISCG
5.1%
VBK
3.9%

Basic Materials

ISCG
3.0%
VBK
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

ISCG
2.9%
VBK
2.4%

Energy

ISCG
2.8%
VBK
4.8%

Communication Services

ISCG
2.4%
VBK
3.5%

Utilities

ISCG
0.9%
VBK
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCG vs. VBK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCG
ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCG vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISCGVBKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.71

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.47

10.16

+0.31

ISCG vs. VBK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the VBK Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCG and VBK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISCG vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCG drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, roughly equal to the maximum VBK drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCG and VBK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCGVBKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.72%

-58.68%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-11.44%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.71%

-27.54%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.80%

-38.39%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

-38.70%

-2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-1.63%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-10.14%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.05%

-0.05%

Volatility

ISCG vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) is 6.05%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that ISCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCGVBKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

7.20%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.62%

15.58%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.55%

20.00%

-1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.03%

23.61%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.19%

22.93%

+0.26%

ISCG vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VBK's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISCG vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison

ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than VBK's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.59%0.61%0.84%0.77%0.92%0.62%0.10%0.27%0.40%0.52%1.19%0.64%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.45%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ISCG and VBK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBK has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to ISCG (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCG dropped -57.72% vs VBK's -58.68%.

On 10-year performance, VBK leads with 11.89% vs 11.69% for ISCG. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, ISCG has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBK has performed better with a 11.89% return vs 11.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for ISCG.

ISCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.45% for VBK.

ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index, while VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISCG and 0.05% for VBK.

ISCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCG and VBK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer