PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCG vs. IJT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCG vs. IJT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCG achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly lower than IJT's 21.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISCG having a 12.03% annualized return and IJT not far behind at 11.65%.


ISCG

1D
0.09%
1M
3.57%
YTD
15.33%
6M
11.70%
1Y
33.36%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
12.03%

IJT

1D
0.36%
1M
5.97%
YTD
21.75%
6M
17.89%
1Y
33.92%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
11.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCG vs. IJT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
15.33%12.88%13.35%23.13%-26.75%-1.26%43.41%27.66%-6.91%24.68%
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
21.75%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%19.22%20.98%-4.40%14.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCG and IJT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2004

0.91

The correlation between ISCG and IJT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCG vs. IJT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISCG
IJT

Industrials

24.4%
18.7%

Technology

22.0%
21.2%

Healthcare

16.8%
14.7%

Financial Services

9.9%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
10.7%

Real Estate

4.8%
6.5%

Energy

3.3%
3.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.8%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
3.3%

Utilities

1.1%
1.7%

Industrials

ISCG
24.4%
IJT
18.7%

Technology

ISCG
22.0%
IJT
21.2%

Healthcare

ISCG
16.8%
IJT
14.7%

Financial Services

ISCG
9.9%
IJT
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ISCG
8.8%
IJT
10.7%

Real Estate

ISCG
4.8%
IJT
6.5%

Energy

ISCG
3.3%
IJT
3.8%

Basic Materials

ISCG
3.2%
IJT
3.0%

Communication Services

ISCG
2.8%
IJT
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

ISCG
2.7%
IJT
3.3%

Utilities

ISCG
1.1%
IJT
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCG vs. IJT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCG
ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCG vs. IJT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISCGIJTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.75

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

13.11

-1.95

ISCG vs. IJT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the IJT Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCG and IJT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISCG vs. IJT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCG drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, roughly equal to the maximum IJT drawdown of -57.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCG and IJT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCGIJTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.72%

-57.61%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-9.08%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.71%

-27.41%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.80%

-29.24%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

-42.03%

+0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-10.29%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.59%

+0.41%

Volatility

ISCG vs. IJT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) at 5.27%. This indicates that ISCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCGIJTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

5.27%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

12.98%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.60%

17.96%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.03%

21.54%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.20%

23.06%

+0.14%

ISCG vs. IJT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IJT's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISCG vs. IJT - Dividend Comparison

ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than IJT's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.71%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.58%0.61%0.84%0.77%0.92%0.62%0.10%0.27%0.40%0.52%1.19%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ISCG and IJT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ISCG has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to IJT (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCG dropped -57.72% vs IJT's -57.61%.

On 10-year performance, ISCG leads with 12.03% vs 11.65% for IJT. On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ISCG has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 11.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJT.

IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.58% for ISCG.

ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index, while IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISCG and 0.18% for IJT.

IJT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCG and IJT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer