JSML vs. OMFS
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS).
JSML and OMFS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JSML is a passively managed fund by Janus Henderson that tracks the performance of the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2016. OMFS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. Both JSML and OMFS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JSML or OMFS.
Correlation
The correlation between JSML and OMFS is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
JSML vs. OMFS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
JSML:
0.99
OMFS:
0.57
JSML:
1.49
OMFS:
0.95
JSML:
1.18
OMFS:
1.11
JSML:
0.90
OMFS:
0.58
JSML:
5.13
OMFS:
2.85
JSML:
3.99%
OMFS:
4.29%
JSML:
20.69%
OMFS:
21.48%
JSML:
-39.64%
OMFS:
-42.50%
JSML:
-7.46%
OMFS:
-7.63%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSML achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly higher than OMFS's 1.99% return.
JSML
2.93%
-2.88%
7.60%
21.85%
7.68%
N/A
OMFS
1.99%
-4.45%
6.32%
13.85%
8.55%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JSML vs. OMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than OMFS's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JSML vs. OMFS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
JSML
OMFS
JSML vs. OMFS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JSML vs. OMFS - Dividend Comparison
JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than OMFS's 1.83% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 1.16% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.53% |
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.83% | 1.87% | 1.28% | 1.83% | 0.66% | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.50% | 0.34% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JSML vs. OMFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, smaller than the maximum OMFS drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and OMFS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JSML vs. OMFS - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) have volatilities of 6.25% and 6.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.