ISCG vs. VIOG
ISCG (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF) and VIOG (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - ISCG tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index while VIOG tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISCG returned 10.97%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for VIOG. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ISCG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VIOG.
Performance
ISCG vs. VIOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCG achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly lower than VIOG's 22.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISCG having a 10.97% annualized return and VIOG not far ahead at 11.09%.
ISCG
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- 26.04%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.44%
VIOG
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- YTD
- 22.73%
- 1Y
- 32.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.43M | $1.55M | $1.83M | |
| $3.95M | $4.53M | $4.83M |
ISCG vs. VIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 13.23% | 12.88% | 13.35% | 23.13% | -26.75% | -1.26% | 43.41% | 27.66% | -6.91% | 24.68% |
VIOG Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | 22.73% | 5.40% | 9.23% | 16.92% | -21.14% | 22.49% | 19.68% | 21.16% | -4.57% | 14.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCG and VIOG is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.88 |
The correlation between ISCG and VIOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISCG vs. VIOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISCG
VIOG
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
ISCG
VIOG
Technology
ISCG
VIOG
Healthcare
ISCG
VIOG
Financial Services
ISCG
VIOG
Consumer Cyclical
ISCG
VIOG
Real Estate
ISCG
VIOG
Basic Materials
ISCG
VIOG
Energy
ISCG
VIOG
Communication Services
ISCG
VIOG
Consumer Defensive
ISCG
VIOG
Utilities
ISCG
VIOG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISCG vs. VIOG — Risk / Return Rank
ISCG
VIOG
ISCG vs. VIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISCG | VIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.30 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 3.36 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.52 | 11.22 | -3.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISCG vs. VIOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCG drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, which is greater than VIOG's maximum drawdown of -41.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCG and VIOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCG | VIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.72% | -41.73% | -15.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -9.03% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.71% | -27.35% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.80% | -29.15% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.48% | -41.73% | +0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.47% | -3.30% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.56% | -7.56% | -4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.70% | +0.46% |
Volatility
ISCG vs. VIOG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISCG | VIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 4.15% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.65% | 12.96% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.62% | 17.88% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 21.46% | +1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.14% | 22.83% | +0.31% |
ISCG vs. VIOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VIOG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISCG vs. VIOG - Dividend Comparison
ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than VIOG's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.59% | 0.61% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% |
VIOG Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | 0.77% | 1.04% | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.17% | 0.69% | 0.68% | 1.09% | 0.76% | 0.87% | 0.92% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, ISCG and VIOG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ISCG has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to VIOG (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCG dropped -57.72% vs VIOG's -41.73%.
On 10-year performance, VIOG leads with 11.09% vs 10.97% for ISCG. On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIOG has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 10.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VIOG.
VIOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.59% for ISCG.
ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index, while VIOG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISCG and 0.15% for VIOG.
VIOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISCG and VIOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer