ISCG vs. VBR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR).
ISCG and VBR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. VBR is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Small Cap Value Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both ISCG and VBR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ISCG or VBR.
Key characteristics
| ISCG | VBR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 20.64% | 19.39% |
| 1Y Return | 44.51% | 39.83% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.06% | 6.85% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.08% | 11.87% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.81% | 9.56% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.19 | 2.23 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.06 | 3.17 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.42 | 2.95 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.19 | 12.96 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.22% | 2.95% |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.36% | 17.16% |
| Max Drawdown | -100.00% | -62.01% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.99% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCG and VBR is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ISCG vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ISCG achieves a 20.64% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 19.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISCG having a 9.81% annualized return and VBR not far behind at 9.56%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISCG vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VBR's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ISCG vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ISCG vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than VBR's 1.88% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% | 0.56% | 0.53% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.77% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
ISCG vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCG drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than VBR's maximum drawdown of -62.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCG and VBR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ISCG vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) have volatilities of 5.84% and 5.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.