JSML vs. CWS
JSML (Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and CWS (AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JSML is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while CWS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. JSML is passively managed, while CWS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JSML returned 6.42%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for CWS. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JSML charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for CWS.
Performance
JSML vs. CWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSML achieves a 20.92% return, which is significantly higher than CWS's -0.70% return.
JSML
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 20.92%
- 6M
- 19.03%
- 1Y
- 35.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
CWS
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- 0.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.40%
- 10Y*
- —
JSML vs. CWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 20.92% | 13.41% | 12.45% | 30.09% | -29.40% | 3.08% | 35.38% | 32.50% | -2.53% | 20.93% |
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | -0.70% | 6.43% | 9.82% | 25.06% | -10.42% | 22.20% | 17.12% | 30.97% | -6.46% | 20.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSML and CWS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.67 |
The correlation between JSML and CWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSML vs. CWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSML
CWS
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Technology
JSML
CWS
Industrials
JSML
CWS
Healthcare
JSML
CWS
Financial Services
JSML
CWS
Consumer Cyclical
JSML
CWS
Real Estate
JSML
CWS
-
Basic Materials
JSML
CWS
-
Consumer Defensive
JSML
CWS
Energy
JSML
CWS
-
Communication Services
JSML
CWS
-
Utilities
JSML
-
CWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSML vs. CWS — Risk / Return Rank
JSML
CWS
JSML vs. CWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JSML | CWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.02 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 0.04 | +2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 0.09 | +8.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JSML | CWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 0.03 | +1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.54 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.67 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
JSML vs. CWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, which is greater than CWS's maximum drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and CWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSML | CWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.65% | -33.82% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.84% | -11.92% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.60% | -16.56% | -9.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.91% | -24.87% | -13.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.16% | +5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.86% | -4.54% | -6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 4.62% | -0.45% |
Volatility
JSML vs. CWS - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) at 3.39%. This indicates that JSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSML | CWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 3.39% | +3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.00% | 10.35% | +5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.59% | 13.31% | +8.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 15.66% | +8.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 16.91% | +7.36% |
JSML vs. CWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CWS's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSML vs. CWS - Dividend Comparison
JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than CWS's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | 0.31% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.16% | 0.27% | 0.39% | 2.07% | 0.29% | 0.03% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.79% | 0.94% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSML and CWS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSML has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to CWS (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs CWS's -33.82%.
On 5-year performance, CWS leads with 8.40% vs 6.42% for JSML. On fees, JSML is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, CWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CWS has performed better with a 8.40% return vs 6.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSML is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for CWS.
JSML has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.31% for CWS.
JSML is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while CWS is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 0.77% for CWS.
JSML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSML and CWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer