PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCG vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCG vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCG achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCG has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 12.03%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.58% annualized return.


ISCG

1D
0.09%
1M
3.57%
YTD
15.33%
6M
11.70%
1Y
33.36%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
12.03%

DGRO

1D
0.08%
1M
0.48%
YTD
8.84%
6M
8.25%
1Y
22.81%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCG vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
15.33%12.88%13.35%23.13%-26.75%-1.26%43.41%27.66%-6.91%24.68%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.84%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCG and DGRO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.73

The correlation between ISCG and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCG vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISCG
DGRO

Industrials

24.4%
10.4%

Technology

22.0%
22.0%

Healthcare

16.8%
16.5%

Financial Services

9.9%
20.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
5.4%

Real Estate

4.8%

-

Energy

3.3%
5.1%

Basic Materials

3.2%
2.4%

Communication Services

2.8%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
11.1%

Utilities

1.1%
6.4%

Industrials

ISCG
24.4%
DGRO
10.4%

Technology

ISCG
22.0%
DGRO
22.0%

Healthcare

ISCG
16.8%
DGRO
16.5%

Financial Services

ISCG
9.9%
DGRO
20.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ISCG
8.8%
DGRO
5.4%

Real Estate

ISCG
4.8%
DGRO

-

Energy

ISCG
3.3%
DGRO
5.1%

Basic Materials

ISCG
3.2%
DGRO
2.4%

Communication Services

ISCG
2.8%
DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

ISCG
2.7%
DGRO
11.1%

Utilities

ISCG
1.1%
DGRO
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCG vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCG
ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCG vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISCGDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.54

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

13.67

-2.51

ISCG vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCG and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISCG vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCG drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCG and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCGDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.72%

-35.10%

-22.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-6.47%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.71%

-14.03%

-12.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.80%

-19.31%

-18.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

-35.10%

-6.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.21%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-3.43%

-8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

1.67%

+1.33%

Volatility

ISCG vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.64%. This indicates that ISCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCGDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

2.64%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

6.94%

+6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.60%

9.55%

+9.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.03%

13.80%

+9.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.20%

16.63%

+6.57%

ISCG vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISCG vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than DGRO's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.97%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.58%0.61%0.84%0.77%0.92%0.62%0.10%0.27%0.40%0.52%1.19%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISCG and DGRO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCG has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to DGRO (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCG dropped -57.72% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.58% vs 12.03% for ISCG. On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.58% for ISCG.

ISCG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISCG and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCG and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer