JHML vs. CCOR
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR).
JHML and CCOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JHML is a passively managed fund by Manulife that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2015. CCOR is an actively managed fund by Core Alternative Capital. It was launched on May 24, 2017.
Performance
JHML vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JHML vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | -1.98% | 15.91% | 19.84% | 21.16% | -15.94% | 26.90% | 17.02% | 30.94% | -6.45% | 12.63% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -0.34% | 3.52% | -5.70% | -11.92% | 2.51% | 9.90% | 4.07% | 6.03% | 4.64% | 3.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHML achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's -0.34% return.
JHML
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 17.37%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- 12.92%
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- -1.48%
- 3Y*
- -3.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.93%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JHML vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHML has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JHML vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank
JHML
CCOR
JHML vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHML | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | -0.14 | +1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | -0.14 | +1.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.98 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | -0.19 | +1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.24 | -0.35 | +7.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHML | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | -0.14 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | -0.08 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.15 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between JHML and CCOR is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JHML vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison
JHML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, which matches CCOR's 1.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | 1.08% | 1.06% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.46% | 1.08% | 1.59% | 1.73% | 1.57% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 0.38% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JHML vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and CCOR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHML | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.13% | -22.99% | -13.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -9.17% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.47% | -22.99% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.40% | -17.23% | +11.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -7.07% | +2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 4.95% | -2.46% |
Volatility
JHML vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.17%. This indicates that JHML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JHML | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 2.17% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 5.44% | +3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.58% | 10.74% | +6.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 11.13% | +5.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 10.81% | +6.94% |