JHML vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
JHML and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JHML is a passively managed fund by Manulife that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2015. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JHML or BDGS.
Correlation
The correlation between JHML and BDGS is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
JHML vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
JHML:
1.70
BDGS:
3.97
JHML:
2.33
BDGS:
7.04
JHML:
1.31
BDGS:
2.23
JHML:
2.66
BDGS:
8.70
JHML:
9.33
BDGS:
38.12
JHML:
2.15%
BDGS:
0.55%
JHML:
11.84%
BDGS:
5.24%
JHML:
-36.13%
BDGS:
-5.38%
JHML:
-0.56%
BDGS:
-0.09%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHML achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 2.62% return.
JHML
4.26%
0.41%
9.16%
20.46%
12.92%
N/A
BDGS
2.62%
0.22%
9.20%
20.60%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JHML vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHML has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JHML vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
JHML
BDGS
JHML vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JHML vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
JHML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than BDGS's 1.76% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | 1.12% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.46% | 1.08% | 1.59% | 1.73% | 1.57% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 0.38% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 1.76% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JHML vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JHML vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 0.62%. This indicates that JHML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.