JHML vs. BDGS
JHML (John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHML is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index, while BDGS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bridges. JHML is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JHML returned 20.37%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for BDGS. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHML charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BDGS.
Performance
JHML vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHML achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 5.64% return.
JHML
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 26.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.24%
BDGS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 13.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHML vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | 11.62% | 15.91% | 19.84% | 15.80% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 5.64% | 10.61% | 19.07% | 8.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHML and BDGS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between JHML and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHML vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHML
BDGS
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
JHML
BDGS
Financial Services
JHML
BDGS
Industrials
JHML
BDGS
Consumer Cyclical
JHML
BDGS
Healthcare
JHML
BDGS
Communication Services
JHML
BDGS
Consumer Defensive
JHML
BDGS
Energy
JHML
BDGS
Utilities
JHML
BDGS
Basic Materials
JHML
BDGS
Real Estate
JHML
BDGS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHML vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
JHML
BDGS
JHML vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHML | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.34 | 2.29 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.28 | 3.40 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.45 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.61 | 16.47 | -0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHML | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.29 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.76 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
JHML vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and BDGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHML | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.13% | -9.12% | -27.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -4.03% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.20% | -9.12% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.83% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -0.64% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 0.84% | +0.87% |
Volatility
JHML vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.14%. This indicates that JHML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHML | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 1.14% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.70% | 4.74% | +3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 6.08% | +5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 8.21% | +8.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 8.21% | +9.55% |
JHML vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHML has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHML vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
JHML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than BDGS's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.52% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | 0.95% | 1.06% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.46% | 1.08% | 1.59% | 1.73% | 1.57% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHML and BDGS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHML has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to BDGS (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHML dropped -36.13% vs BDGS's -9.12%.
On 3-year performance, JHML leads with 20.37% vs 14.06% for BDGS. On fees, JHML is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JHML has performed better with a 20.37% return vs 14.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHML is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BDGS.
JHML has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.52% for BDGS.
JHML is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BDGS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHML and 0.85% for BDGS.
JHML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHML and BDGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer