JHML vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JHML (John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, JHML returned 14.29%/yr vs 21.79%/yr for FBGRX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JHML charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

JHML vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHML achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 17.66% return. Over the past 10 years, JHML has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 14.29%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.79% annualized return.

JHML

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 4.74%
• YTD: 12.12%
• 6M: 12.81%
• 1Y: 28.27%
• 3Y*: 20.55%
• 5Y*: 12.14%
• 10Y*: 14.29%

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 8.31%
• YTD: 17.66%
• 6M: 18.83%
• 1Y: 45.12%
• 3Y*: 32.21%
• 5Y*: 16.60%
• 10Y*: 21.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHML vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF	12.12%	15.91%	19.84%	21.16%	-15.94%	26.90%	17.02%	30.94%	-6.45%	21.52%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	17.66%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between JHML and FBGRX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2015	0.84

The correlation between JHML and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JHML vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHML

JHML Risk / Return Rank: 75
JHML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
JHML Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
JHML Omega Ratio Rank: 74
JHML Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
JHML Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHML vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHML	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.67	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	3.42	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.45	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	3.62	-0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.72	15.38	+1.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHML vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHML Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHML and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHML	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.67	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.67	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.92	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.68	+0.14

Drawdowns

JHML vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHML	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.13%	-58.64%	+22.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.95%	-12.65%	+4.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.20%	-27.07%	+8.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.47%	-43.08%	+19.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.13%	-43.08%	+6.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.30%	-12.53%	+8.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	2.98%	-1.27%

Volatility

JHML vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) is 2.86%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that JHML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHML	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	4.14%	-1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.71%	12.99%	-4.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.47%	17.46%	-5.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.29%	24.88%	-8.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.76%	23.69%	-5.93%

JHML vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHML has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHML vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

JHML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than FBGRX's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.61%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF	0.94%	1.06%	1.16%	1.39%	1.46%	1.08%	1.59%	1.73%	1.57%	1.44%	1.36%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHML and FBGRX in my portfolio?

JHML and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHML or FBGRX?

FBGRX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to JHML (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHML dropped -36.13% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.