JHML vs. ^GSPC
JHML (John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, JHML returned 14.35%/yr vs 13.71%/yr for ^GSPC. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep.
Performance
JHML vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHML achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 7.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JHML having a 14.35% annualized return and ^GSPC not far behind at 13.71%.
JHML
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 10.19%
- 6M
- 9.22%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
^GSPC
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
JHML vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | 10.19% | 15.91% | 19.84% | 21.16% | -15.94% | 26.90% | 17.02% | 30.94% | -6.45% | 21.52% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 7.60% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -6.24% | 19.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHML and ^GSPC is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015 | 0.97 |
The correlation between JHML and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHML vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
JHML
^GSPC
JHML vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHML | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.46 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.73 | 10.92 | +2.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHML vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHML | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.13% | -56.78% | +20.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -9.10% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.20% | -18.90% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.47% | -25.43% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.13% | -33.92% | -2.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -3.21% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -10.71% | +6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 2.04% | -0.29% |
Volatility
JHML vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) is 4.39%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that JHML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHML | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 4.89% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 9.93% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 12.57% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 17.00% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 18.08% | -0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, JHML and ^GSPC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
^GSPC has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to JHML (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHML dropped -36.13% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
JHML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHML and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer