CCOR vs. SPY
CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCOR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Core Alternative Capital, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. CCOR is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CCOR returned -2.56%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SPY. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCOR charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
CCOR vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCOR achieves a -3.71% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -4.87%
- 1Y
- -5.97%
- 3Y*
- -2.34%
- 5Y*
- -2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
CCOR vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -3.71% | 3.52% | -5.70% | -11.92% | 2.51% | 9.90% | 4.07% | 6.03% | 4.64% | 3.68% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 12.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOR and SPY is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017 | 0.24 |
The correlation between CCOR and SPY shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (3 years) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CCOR vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CCOR
SPY
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
CCOR
SPY
Technology
CCOR
SPY
Healthcare
CCOR
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
CCOR
SPY
Industrials
CCOR
SPY
Communication Services
CCOR
SPY
Energy
CCOR
SPY
Consumer Defensive
CCOR
SPY
Utilities
CCOR
SPY
Basic Materials
CCOR
SPY
Real Estate
CCOR
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOR vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
CCOR
SPY
CCOR vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCOR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.43 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 3.16 | -3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 14.72 | -16.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCOR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 | 2.38 | -3.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.82 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.59 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
CCOR vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOR and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.99% | -55.19% | +32.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.75% | -8.88% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.31% | -18.76% | +6.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.99% | -24.50% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.03% | -0.70% | -19.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -9.05% | +1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 1.91% | +1.86% |
Volatility
CCOR vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is 1.78%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that CCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 2.84% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.96% | 8.90% | -3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.93% | 11.83% | -4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 17.05% | -5.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 17.94% | -7.19% |
CCOR vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCOR has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCOR vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.11% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOR and SPY have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to CCOR (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOR dropped -22.99% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.83% vs -2.56% for CCOR. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.83% return vs -2.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.
CCOR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Core Alternative Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for CCOR and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCOR and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer