PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMD vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMD vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 16.41% return.


JHMD

1D
1.14%
1M
2.87%
6M
6.88%
YTD
13.16%
1Y
25.32%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.74%

VEA

1D
1.66%
1M
1.99%
6M
9.00%
YTD
16.41%
1Y
30.82%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.24%
ALL TIME*
5.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.03M$3.93M$4.41M
$653.63M$753.15M$792.32M

JHMD vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
13.16%33.91%1.78%19.43%-13.95%11.83%7.25%19.83%-14.54%25.02%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
16.41%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMD and VEA is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2016

0.95

The correlation between JHMD and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHMD vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHMD
VEA

Financial Services

25.7%
23.1%

Industrials

19.3%
17.9%

Healthcare

9.1%
7.9%

Technology

8.9%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
7.3%

Basic Materials

7.4%
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
5.3%

Utilities

5.3%
3.1%

Communication Services

4.9%
3.2%

Energy

3.3%
4.5%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.5%

Financial Services

JHMD
25.7%
VEA
23.1%

Industrials

JHMD
19.3%
VEA
17.9%

Healthcare

JHMD
9.1%
VEA
7.9%

Technology

JHMD
8.9%
VEA
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

JHMD
7.4%
VEA
7.3%

Basic Materials

JHMD
7.4%
VEA
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

JHMD
7.3%
VEA
5.3%

Utilities

JHMD
5.3%
VEA
3.1%

Communication Services

JHMD
4.9%
VEA
3.2%

Energy

JHMD
3.3%
VEA
4.5%

Real Estate

JHMD
1.4%
VEA
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMD vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHMD
JHMD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JHMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHMD vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHMDVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.66

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.36

9.95

-1.58

JHMD vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMD and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHMD vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMDVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-60.68%

+25.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.23%

-11.63%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-13.45%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.38%

-29.71%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.23%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-13.19%

+6.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.11%

-0.08%

Volatility

JHMD vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) is 4.17%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that JHMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMDVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

5.44%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.08%

15.43%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.21%

17.29%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

16.86%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

17.22%

-0.05%

JHMD vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMD vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than VEA's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
2.95%3.19%3.55%3.01%2.85%3.22%1.89%3.19%2.09%2.27%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.51%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JHMD and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to JHMD (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.94% vs 9.45% for JHMD. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JHMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 9.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMD.

JHMD has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 2.51% for VEA.

JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMD and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer