JHSC vs. JHEM
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM).
JHSC and JHEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JHSC is a passively managed fund by Manulife that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. JHEM is a passively managed fund by Manulife that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index. It was launched on Sep 27, 2018. Both JHSC and JHEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
JHSC vs. JHEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JHSC vs. JHEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 2.14% | 6.88% | 9.74% | 20.77% | -14.65% | 19.55% | 11.60% | 24.43% | -18.58% |
JHEM John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 4.13% | 30.49% | 4.58% | 12.94% | -17.90% | 2.10% | 11.50% | 17.68% | -7.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHSC achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than JHEM's 4.13% return.
JHSC
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 3.20%
- 1Y
- 16.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.67%
- 10Y*
- —
JHEM
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- -9.49%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 31.74%
- 3Y*
- 15.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JHSC vs. JHEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHSC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than JHEM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JHSC vs. JHEM — Risk / Return Rank
JHSC
JHEM
JHSC vs. JHEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHSC | JHEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 1.70 | -0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 2.28 | -1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.33 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 2.57 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.69 | 10.02 | -5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHSC | JHEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 1.70 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.29 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.33 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between JHSC and JHEM is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JHSC vs. JHEM - Dividend Comparison
JHSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than JHEM's 2.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.10% | 1.13% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.14% | 1.09% |
JHEM John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 2.30% | 2.39% | 2.93% | 2.87% | 2.84% | 2.71% | 1.67% | 2.37% | 0.21% |
Drawdowns
JHSC vs. JHEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHSC drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, which is greater than JHEM's maximum drawdown of -34.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHSC and JHEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHSC | JHEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.66% | -34.99% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.36% | -12.34% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.21% | -32.15% | +6.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.32% | -9.49% | +2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -10.12% | +2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 3.17% | +0.42% |
Volatility
JHSC vs. JHEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) is 6.20%, while John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) has a volatility of 9.66%. This indicates that JHSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JHSC | JHEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 9.66% | -3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 14.04% | -1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.66% | 18.81% | +2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 17.15% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 20.45% | +1.90% |