JHSC vs. JHEM
JHSC (John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and JHEM (John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while JHEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHSC returned 7.04%/yr vs 8.05%/yr for JHEM. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHSC charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for JHEM.
Performance
JHSC vs. JHEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHSC achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than JHEM's 25.90% return.
JHSC
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 24.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- —
JHEM
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 25.90%
- 6M
- 29.30%
- 1Y
- 52.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- —
JHSC vs. JHEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 11.55% | 6.88% | 9.74% | 20.77% | -14.65% | 19.55% | 11.60% | 24.43% | -18.58% |
JHEM John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 25.90% | 30.49% | 4.58% | 12.94% | -17.90% | 2.10% | 11.50% | 17.68% | -7.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHSC and JHEM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.61 |
The correlation between JHSC and JHEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHSC vs. JHEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHSC
JHEM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
JHSC
JHEM
Industrials
JHSC
JHEM
Technology
JHSC
JHEM
Consumer Cyclical
JHSC
JHEM
Energy
JHSC
JHEM
Healthcare
JHSC
JHEM
Real Estate
JHSC
JHEM
Basic Materials
JHSC
JHEM
Utilities
JHSC
JHEM
Consumer Defensive
JHSC
JHEM
Communication Services
JHSC
JHEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHSC vs. JHEM — Risk / Return Rank
JHSC
JHEM
JHSC vs. JHEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHSC | JHEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.49 | 2.80 | -1.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 3.65 | -1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.51 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 4.24 | -1.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | 16.45 | -7.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHSC | JHEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 2.80 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.46 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.45 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
JHSC vs. JHEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHSC drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, which is greater than JHEM's maximum drawdown of -34.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHSC and JHEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHSC | JHEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.66% | -34.99% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -12.34% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -18.16% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.21% | -32.11% | +6.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -1.24% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -9.95% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 3.17% | -0.39% |
Volatility
JHSC vs. JHEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) is 4.16%, while John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) has a volatility of 8.11%. This indicates that JHSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHSC | JHEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 8.11% | -3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 16.25% | -5.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 18.69% | -2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 17.61% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.21% | 20.60% | +1.61% |
JHSC vs. JHEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHSC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than JHEM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHSC vs. JHEM - Dividend Comparison
JHSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than JHEM's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHEM John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 1.90% | 2.39% | 2.93% | 2.87% | 2.84% | 2.71% | 1.67% | 2.37% | 0.21% |
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.13% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.14% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHSC and JHEM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHEM has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to JHSC (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHSC dropped -42.66% vs JHEM's -34.99%.
On 5-year performance, JHEM leads with 8.05% vs 7.04% for JHSC. On fees, JHSC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, JHSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JHEM has performed better with a 8.05% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHSC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JHEM.
JHEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.01% for JHSC.
JHSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while JHEM is Emerging Markets Equities. JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while JHEM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHSC and 0.49% for JHEM.
JHEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHSC and JHEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer