PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHSC vs. JHEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHSC vs. JHEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHSC achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than JHEM's 25.90% return.


JHSC

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.04%
YTD
11.55%
6M
10.59%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*

JHEM

1D
-1.24%
1M
9.35%
YTD
25.90%
6M
29.30%
1Y
52.05%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHSC vs. JHEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
11.55%6.88%9.74%20.77%-14.65%19.55%11.60%24.43%-18.58%
JHEM
John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
25.90%30.49%4.58%12.94%-17.90%2.10%11.50%17.68%-7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between JHSC and JHEM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.61

The correlation between JHSC and JHEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHSC vs. JHEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHSC
JHEM

Financial Services

18.3%
21.9%

Industrials

16.8%
8.4%

Technology

14.1%
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

14.1%
11.7%

Energy

7.5%
5.3%

Healthcare

7.4%
3.0%

Real Estate

6.0%
0.6%

Basic Materials

5.1%
8.6%

Utilities

4.2%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.5%

Communication Services

3.0%
7.5%

Financial Services

JHSC
18.3%
JHEM
21.9%

Industrials

JHSC
16.8%
JHEM
8.4%

Technology

JHSC
14.1%
JHEM
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

JHSC
14.1%
JHEM
11.7%

Energy

JHSC
7.5%
JHEM
5.3%

Healthcare

JHSC
7.4%
JHEM
3.0%

Real Estate

JHSC
6.0%
JHEM
0.6%

Basic Materials

JHSC
5.1%
JHEM
8.6%

Utilities

JHSC
4.2%
JHEM
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

JHSC
3.4%
JHEM
3.5%

Communication Services

JHSC
3.0%
JHEM
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHSC vs. JHEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHSC
JHSC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JHSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
JHSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

JHEM
JHEM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
JHEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
JHEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHSC vs. JHEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHSCJHEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

2.80

-1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

3.65

-1.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.51

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

4.24

-1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.69

16.45

-7.75

JHSC vs. JHEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the JHEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHSC and JHEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHSCJHEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.80

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.46

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.45

-0.06

Drawdowns

JHSC vs. JHEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHSC drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, which is greater than JHEM's maximum drawdown of -34.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHSC and JHEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHSCJHEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.66%

-34.99%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-12.34%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-18.16%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.21%

-32.11%

+6.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-1.24%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-9.95%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

3.17%

-0.39%

Volatility

JHSC vs. JHEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) is 4.16%, while John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) has a volatility of 8.11%. This indicates that JHSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHSCJHEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

8.11%

-3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

16.25%

-5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

18.69%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.15%

17.61%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.21%

20.60%

+1.61%

JHSC vs. JHEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHSC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than JHEM's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHSC vs. JHEM - Dividend Comparison

JHSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than JHEM's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JHEM
John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
1.90%2.39%2.93%2.87%2.84%2.71%1.67%2.37%0.21%
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.01%1.13%0.96%0.98%1.13%1.08%1.12%1.14%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHSC and JHEM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHEM has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to JHSC (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHSC dropped -42.66% vs JHEM's -34.99%.

On 5-year performance, JHEM leads with 8.05% vs 7.04% for JHSC. On fees, JHSC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, JHSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JHEM has performed better with a 8.05% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHSC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JHEM.

JHEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.01% for JHSC.

JHSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while JHEM is Emerging Markets Equities. JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while JHEM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHSC and 0.49% for JHEM.

JHEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHSC and JHEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer