PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHSC vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHSC vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHSC achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 22.50% return.


JHSC

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.23%
6M
8.71%
YTD
15.31%
1Y
24.76%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.97%

CALF

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.89%
6M
19.77%
YTD
22.50%
1Y
39.59%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.38M$24.48M$25.33M
$4.07M$3.28M$2.18M

JHSC vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
15.31%6.88%9.74%20.77%-14.65%19.55%11.60%24.43%-12.50%4.48%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF
22.50%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%40.68%16.55%18.18%-10.06%9.69%

Correlation

The correlation between JHSC and CALF is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.88

The correlation between JHSC and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JHSC vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHSC
CALF

Financial Services

18.6%
0.2%

Industrials

17.0%
9.3%

Technology

14.8%
23.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.1%
23.2%

Healthcare

8.6%
11.6%

Real Estate

6.2%
1.8%

Energy

6.1%
13.7%

Basic Materials

5.1%
4.2%

Utilities

3.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
5.3%

Communication Services

2.8%
7.6%

Financial Services

JHSC
18.6%
CALF
0.2%

Industrials

JHSC
17.0%
CALF
9.3%

Technology

JHSC
14.8%
CALF
23.4%

Consumer Cyclical

JHSC
14.1%
CALF
23.2%

Healthcare

JHSC
8.6%
CALF
11.6%

Real Estate

JHSC
6.2%
CALF
1.8%

Energy

JHSC
6.1%
CALF
13.7%

Basic Materials

JHSC
5.1%
CALF
4.2%

Utilities

JHSC
3.8%
CALF

-

Consumer Defensive

JHSC
3.0%
CALF
5.3%

Communication Services

JHSC
2.8%
CALF
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHSC vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHSC
JHSC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JHSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JHSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHSC vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHSCCALFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.40

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

6.13

-3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

17.68

-9.22

JHSC vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHSC and CALF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHSC vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHSC drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHSC and CALF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHSCCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.66%

-47.58%

+4.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-6.02%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-34.22%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.21%

-34.22%

+9.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-1.88%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-10.57%

+2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.09%

+0.64%

Volatility

JHSC vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) is 3.42%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that JHSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHSCCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

5.09%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

11.64%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.07%

16.13%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.05%

23.23%

-3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.07%

25.89%

-3.82%

JHSC vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHSC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHSC vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

JHSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than CALF's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF
1.12%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.01%1.13%0.96%0.98%1.13%1.08%1.12%1.14%1.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHSC and CALF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CALF has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to JHSC (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHSC dropped -42.66% vs CALF's -47.58%.

On 5-year performance, JHSC leads with 7.89% vs 6.29% for CALF. On fees, JHSC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, JHSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JHSC has performed better with a 7.89% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHSC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 1.01% for JHSC.

JHSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while CALF is Small Cap Value Equities. JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHSC and 0.59% for CALF.

CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHSC and CALF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer