JHSC vs. SMMV
JHSC (John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and SMMV (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while SMMV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHSC returned 7.89%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for SMMV. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JHSC charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SMMV.
Performance
JHSC vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHSC achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 9.33% return.
JHSC
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 15.31%
- 1Y
- 24.76%
- 3Y*
- 12.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.97%
SMMV
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 7.36%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.07M | $3.28M | $2.18M | |
| $337.38K | $347.17K | $431.55K |
JHSC vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 15.31% | 6.88% | 9.74% | 20.77% | -14.65% | 19.55% | 11.60% | 24.43% | -12.50% | 4.48% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 9.33% | 6.42% | 18.29% | 5.63% | -10.00% | 16.64% | -2.88% | 24.21% | 1.15% | 2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHSC and SMMV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between JHSC and SMMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JHSC vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHSC
SMMV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
JHSC
SMMV
Industrials
JHSC
SMMV
Technology
JHSC
SMMV
Consumer Cyclical
JHSC
SMMV
Healthcare
JHSC
SMMV
Real Estate
JHSC
SMMV
Energy
JHSC
SMMV
Basic Materials
JHSC
SMMV
Utilities
JHSC
SMMV
Consumer Defensive
JHSC
SMMV
Communication Services
JHSC
SMMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHSC vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank
JHSC
SMMV
JHSC vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHSC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 2.19 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 6.75 | +1.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHSC vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHSC drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, which is greater than SMMV's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHSC and SMMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHSC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.66% | -38.77% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -7.02% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -13.68% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.21% | -18.00% | -7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -1.07% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -5.04% | -2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.28% | +0.45% |
Volatility
JHSC vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.85%. This indicates that JHSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHSC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 2.85% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | 6.98% | +4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 9.75% | +6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.05% | 13.44% | +6.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 15.62% | +6.45% |
JHSC vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHSC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHSC vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison
JHSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than SMMV's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.13% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.76% | 2.30% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHSC and SMMV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHSC has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to SMMV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHSC dropped -42.66% vs SMMV's -38.77%.
On 5-year performance, JHSC leads with 7.89% vs 6.29% for SMMV. On fees, SMMV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JHSC has performed better with a 7.89% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHSC.
SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.01% for JHSC.
JHSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SMMV is Small Cap Blend Equities. JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHSC and 0.20% for SMMV.
SMMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHSC and SMMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer