JHSC vs. SMMV
JHSC (John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and SMMV (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - JHSC tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index while SMMV tracks the MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHSC returned 7.04%/yr vs 4.87%/yr for SMMV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JHSC charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SMMV.
Performance
JHSC vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHSC achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 2.04% return.
JHSC
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 24.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- —
SMMV
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- —
JHSC vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 11.55% | 6.88% | 9.74% | 20.77% | -14.65% | 19.55% | 11.60% | 24.43% | -12.50% | 4.48% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.04% | 6.42% | 18.29% | 5.63% | -10.00% | 16.64% | -2.88% | 24.21% | 1.15% | 3.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHSC and SMMV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between JHSC and SMMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHSC vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHSC
SMMV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
JHSC
SMMV
Industrials
JHSC
SMMV
Technology
JHSC
SMMV
Consumer Cyclical
JHSC
SMMV
Energy
JHSC
SMMV
Healthcare
JHSC
SMMV
Real Estate
JHSC
SMMV
Basic Materials
JHSC
SMMV
Utilities
JHSC
SMMV
Consumer Defensive
JHSC
SMMV
Communication Services
JHSC
SMMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHSC vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank
JHSC
SMMV
JHSC vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHSC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.11 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 0.89 | +1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | 2.82 | +5.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHSC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 0.64 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.36 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.52 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
JHSC vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHSC drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, which is greater than SMMV's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHSC and SMMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHSC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.66% | -38.77% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -7.02% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -13.68% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.21% | -18.00% | -7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -4.44% | +3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -5.10% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 2.20% | +0.58% |
Volatility
JHSC vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.27%. This indicates that JHSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHSC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 2.27% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 6.30% | +4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 9.73% | +6.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 13.50% | +6.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.21% | 15.69% | +6.52% |
JHSC vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHSC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHSC vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison
JHSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than SMMV's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.13% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.75% | 1.77% | 1.76% | 2.30% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHSC and SMMV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHSC has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to SMMV (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHSC dropped -42.66% vs SMMV's -38.77%.
On 5-year performance, JHSC leads with 7.04% vs 4.87% for SMMV. On fees, SMMV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JHSC has performed better with a 7.04% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHSC.
SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.01% for JHSC.
JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHSC and 0.20% for SMMV.
JHSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHSC and SMMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer