JHMD vs. JHEM
JHMD (John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF) and JHEM (John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while JHEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHMD returned 8.79%/yr vs 8.51%/yr for JHEM. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHMD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for JHEM.
Performance
JHMD vs. JHEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than JHEM's 27.48% return.
JHMD
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 8.43%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- —
JHEM
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 10.03%
- YTD
- 27.48%
- 6M
- 30.79%
- 1Y
- 54.07%
- 3Y*
- 22.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- —
JHMD vs. JHEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 8.43% | 33.91% | 1.78% | 19.43% | -13.95% | 11.83% | 7.25% | 19.83% | -12.91% |
JHEM John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 27.48% | 30.49% | 4.58% | 12.94% | -17.90% | 2.10% | 11.50% | 17.68% | -7.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMD and JHEM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.75 |
The correlation between JHMD and JHEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHMD vs. JHEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHMD
JHEM
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
JHMD
JHEM
Industrials
JHMD
JHEM
Healthcare
JHMD
JHEM
Basic Materials
JHMD
JHEM
Consumer Cyclical
JHMD
JHEM
Consumer Defensive
JHMD
JHEM
Technology
JHMD
JHEM
Utilities
JHMD
JHEM
Communication Services
JHMD
JHEM
Energy
JHMD
JHEM
Real Estate
JHMD
JHEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMD vs. JHEM — Risk / Return Rank
JHMD
JHEM
JHMD vs. JHEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHMD | JHEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 2.92 | -1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 3.78 | -1.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.54 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 4.43 | -2.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 17.23 | -9.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHMD | JHEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 2.92 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.49 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.46 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
JHMD vs. JHEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, roughly equal to the maximum JHEM drawdown of -34.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and JHEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMD | JHEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -34.99% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.23% | -12.34% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.38% | -18.16% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.38% | -32.11% | +2.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | 0.00% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -9.95% | +3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 3.17% | -0.17% |
Volatility
JHMD vs. JHEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) is 5.19%, while John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that JHMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMD | JHEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 8.00% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | 16.18% | -4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 18.64% | -3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 17.61% | -1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 20.60% | -3.40% |
JHMD vs. JHEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than JHEM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMD vs. JHEM - Dividend Comparison
JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than JHEM's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHEM John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 1.88% | 2.39% | 2.93% | 2.87% | 2.84% | 2.71% | 1.67% | 2.37% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 2.94% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.01% | 2.85% | 3.22% | 1.89% | 3.19% | 2.09% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHMD and JHEM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHEM has higher volatility (8.00%) compared to JHMD (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs JHEM's -34.99%.
On 5-year performance, JHMD leads with 8.79% vs 8.51% for JHEM. On fees, JHMD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JHMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JHMD has performed better with a 8.79% return vs 8.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHMD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JHEM.
JHMD has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 1.88% for JHEM.
JHMD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while JHEM is Emerging Markets Equities. JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while JHEM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.49% for JHEM.
JHEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMD and JHEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer