JHEM vs. DEM
JHEM (John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) and DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - JHEM tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index while DEM tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHEM returned 8.23%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for DEM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JHEM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for DEM.
Performance
JHEM vs. DEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHEM achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than DEM's 19.75% return.
JHEM
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 24.29%
- 6M
- 28.87%
- 1Y
- 45.01%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- —
DEM
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 5.26%
- YTD
- 19.75%
- 6M
- 21.62%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
JHEM vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHEM John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 24.29% | 30.49% | 4.58% | 12.94% | -17.90% | 2.10% | 11.50% | 17.68% | -7.63% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 19.75% | 21.29% | 4.46% | 20.93% | -10.43% | 11.49% | -5.84% | 19.84% | -7.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHEM and DEM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between JHEM and DEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHEM vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHEM
DEM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
JHEM
DEM
Financial Services
JHEM
DEM
Consumer Cyclical
JHEM
DEM
Basic Materials
JHEM
DEM
Industrials
JHEM
DEM
Communication Services
JHEM
DEM
Energy
JHEM
DEM
Consumer Defensive
JHEM
DEM
Healthcare
JHEM
DEM
Utilities
JHEM
DEM
Real Estate
JHEM
DEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHEM vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank
JHEM
DEM
JHEM vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHEM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 3.58 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 12.32 | +1.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHEM vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHEM drawdown since its inception was -34.99%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHEM and DEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHEM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.99% | -51.85% | +16.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.34% | -7.89% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.16% | -15.64% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.83% | -27.18% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | -1.36% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -12.88% | +2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 2.30% | +1.02% |
Volatility
JHEM vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) has a higher volatility of 10.21% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) at 6.11%. This indicates that JHEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHEM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | 6.11% | +4.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.37% | 12.22% | +6.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 14.27% | +6.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 15.46% | +2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.78% | 17.99% | +2.79% |
JHEM vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHEM vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison
JHEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than DEM's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 3.76% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
JHEM John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 1.93% | 2.39% | 2.93% | 2.87% | 2.84% | 2.71% | 1.67% | 2.37% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHEM and DEM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHEM has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to DEM (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHEM dropped -34.99% vs DEM's -51.85%.
On 5-year performance, DEM leads with 10.04% vs 8.23% for JHEM. On fees, JHEM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DEM has performed better with a 10.04% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHEM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.
DEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 1.93% for JHEM.
JHEM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index, while DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JHEM and 0.63% for DEM.
JHEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHEM and DEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer