PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHEM vs. JHSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHEM vs. JHSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) and John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHEM achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than JHSC's 14.22% return.


JHEM

1D
-1.84%
1M
6.02%
YTD
24.29%
6M
28.87%
1Y
45.01%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*

JHSC

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.62%
YTD
14.22%
6M
12.79%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHEM vs. JHSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JHEM
John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
24.29%30.49%4.58%12.94%-17.90%2.10%11.50%17.68%-7.63%
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
14.22%6.88%9.74%20.77%-14.65%19.55%11.60%24.43%-19.30%

Correlation

The correlation between JHEM and JHSC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018

0.61

The correlation between JHEM and JHSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHEM vs. JHSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHEM
JHSC

Technology

33.9%
15.6%

Financial Services

20.1%
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
13.0%

Basic Materials

7.9%
5.1%

Industrials

7.6%
18.3%

Communication Services

6.8%
2.0%

Energy

4.4%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
3.1%

Healthcare

2.7%
8.0%

Utilities

2.6%
4.1%

Real Estate

0.6%
7.6%

Technology

JHEM
33.9%
JHSC
15.6%

Financial Services

JHEM
20.1%
JHSC
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

JHEM
10.5%
JHSC
13.0%

Basic Materials

JHEM
7.9%
JHSC
5.1%

Industrials

JHEM
7.6%
JHSC
18.3%

Communication Services

JHEM
6.8%
JHSC
2.0%

Energy

JHEM
4.4%
JHSC
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

JHEM
3.0%
JHSC
3.1%

Healthcare

JHEM
2.7%
JHSC
8.0%

Utilities

JHEM
2.6%
JHSC
4.1%

Real Estate

JHEM
0.6%
JHSC
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHEM vs. JHSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHEM
JHEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JHEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
JHEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

JHSC
JHSC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
JHSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
JHSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHEM vs. JHSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) and John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHEMJHSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.28

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

2.75

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.62

9.55

+4.07

JHEM vs. JHSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the JHSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHEM and JHSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHEM vs. JHSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHEM drawdown since its inception was -34.99%, smaller than the maximum JHSC drawdown of -42.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHEM and JHSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHEMJHSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.99%

-42.66%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-9.63%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.16%

-25.16%

+7.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.83%

-25.21%

-6.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-0.16%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.92%

-7.75%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.77%

+0.55%

Volatility

JHEM vs. JHSC - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) has a higher volatility of 10.21% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) at 4.17%. This indicates that JHEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHEMJHSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.21%

4.17%

+6.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.37%

11.22%

+7.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.49%

16.29%

+4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.01%

20.18%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.78%

22.18%

-1.40%

JHEM vs. JHSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than JHSC's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHEM vs. JHSC - Dividend Comparison

JHEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than JHSC's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JHEM
John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
1.93%2.39%2.93%2.87%2.84%2.71%1.67%2.37%0.21%
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
0.99%1.13%0.96%0.98%1.13%1.08%1.12%1.14%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHEM and JHSC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHEM has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to JHSC (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHEM dropped -34.99% vs JHSC's -42.66%.

On 5-year performance, JHEM leads with 8.23% vs 7.89% for JHSC. On fees, JHSC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, JHSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JHEM has performed better with a 8.23% return vs 7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHSC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JHEM.

JHEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.99% for JHSC.

JHEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while JHSC is Small Cap Growth Equities. JHEM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index, while JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JHEM and 0.42% for JHSC.

JHEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHEM and JHSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer